========================================================================== |
UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
________________________ |
|
FORM 10-K |
|
|
[X] |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
or |
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
|
|
|
For the transition period from _______________ to ______________ |
|
|
Commission file number 0-7201. |
|
|
|
BROWN & BROWN, INC. |
|
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
|
|
||
|
Florida |
59-0864469 |
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
220 South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (386) 252-9601 |
|
Registrant's Website: www.bbinsurance.com |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
|
|
|
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which Registered |
__________________________________ |
_____________________________________ |
COMMON STOCK, $0.10 PAR VALUE |
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE |
RIGHTS TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK |
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE |
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None |
|
________________________ |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] |
|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X ] |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes [ ] No [ X] |
|
|
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (i.e., other than directors, officers, or holders of more than 5% of the Registrant's common stock) computed by reference to the last reported price at which the stock was sold on March 18, 2003, was $30.46. |
|
The number of shares of the Registrant's common stock, $.10 par value, outstanding as of March 18, 2003 was 68,096,951. |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE |
Portions of the Registrant's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II of this Report. With the exception of those portions which are incorporated by reference, the Registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders is not deemed filed as part of this Report. |
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. |
============================================================================== |
|
BROWN & BROWN, INC. |
|
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 |
|
PART I |
|
|
ITEM 1. |
Business |
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements |
|
We make "forward-looking statements" within the "safe harbor" provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this report and in the documents we incorporate by reference into this report. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "plan" and "continue" or similar words. We have based these statements on our current expectations about future events. Although we believe that our expectations reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, our actual results may differ materially from what we currently expect. Important factors which could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this report include: |
|
-material adverse changes in economic conditions in the markets we serve; |
|
-future regulatory actions and conditions in the states in which we conduct our business; |
|
-competition from others in the insurance agency and brokerage business; |
|
-the integration of our operations with those of businesses or assets we have acquired or |
|
-other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public |
|
You should carefully read this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. |
|
We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. |
|
General |
|
We are the largest insurance agency and brokerage headquartered in the southeastern United States and the sixth largest in the country, based on 2001 total revenues. The name of the company following the 1993 combination of Brown & Brown, Inc., which commenced doing business in 1939, and Poe & Associates, Inc., which commenced doing business in 1959, was Poe & Brown, Inc. The name was changed to Brown & Brown, Inc. in 1999. |
|
We market and sell to our customers insurance products and services, primarily in the property and casualty area. As an agent and broker, we do not assume underwriting risks. Instead, we provide our customers with quality insurance contracts, as well as other targeted, customized risk management products. |
|
We are compensated for our services primarily by commissions paid by insurance companies and fees paid by customers for certain services. The commission is usually a percentage of the premium paid by the insured. Commission rates generally depend upon the type of insurance, the particular insurance company and the nature of the services provided by us. In some cases, a commission is shared with other agents or brokers who have acted jointly with us in a transaction. We may also receive from an insurance company a contingent commission that is generally based on the profitability and volume of business placed with it by us over a given period of time. Fees are principally generated by our Services Division, which offers third-party administration, benefit consulting and managed healthcare services primarily in the workers' compensation and employee benefit markets. The amount of our income from commissions and fees is a function of, among other factors, continued new business production, retention of existing customers, acquisitions and fluctuations in insurance premium rates and insurable exposure units. |
|
Premium pricing within the property and casualty insurance underwriting industry has historically been cyclical, displaying a high degree of volatility based on prevailing economic and competitive conditions. From the mid-1980s through 1999, the property and casualty insurance industry experienced a "soft market" during which the underwriting capacity of insurance companies expanded, stimulating an increase in competition and a decrease in premium rates and related commissions. The effect of this softness in rates on our revenues was somewhat offset by our acquisitions and new business production. As a result of increasing "loss ratios" (the comparison of incurred losses plus adjustment expense against earned premiums) of insurance companies through 1999, there was a general increase in premium rates beginning in the first quarter of 2000 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2002. Although premium increases vary by line of business, geographical region, insurance company and specific underwriting factors, we believe this was the first time since 1987 that we operated in an environment of increased premiums for three consecutive years. While we cannot predict the timing or extent of premium pricing changes as a result of market fluctuations or their effect on our operations in the future, we believe that premium rates will continue to increase through at least 2003. |
|
Beginning in 1993 through 2002, we acquired 118 insurance agency operations (excluding acquired books of business) that had aggregate estimated annual revenues of $302.0 million for the 12 calendar months immediately following the date of acquisition. Of these, 32 operations were acquired during 2002, with aggregate estimated annual revenues of $62.0 million for the 12 calendar months immediately preceding the date of acquisition. Additionally, 26 operations were acquired during 2001, with aggregate estimated annual revenues of $148.0 million for the 12 calendar months immediately following the date of acquisition, including our asset acquisition of the insurance agency business-related assets of Riedman Corporation, effective January 1, 2001, with estimated annual revenues of $54.0 million for the 12 calendar months immediately following the date of acquisition. The large number of acquisitions in 2001 was largely due to the then-anticipated elimination of pooling-of-interests accounting for stock acquisitions, which encouraged the shareholders of certain agencies, especially "C" corporations, to accelerate the sale of their stock to us. As of December 31, 2002, our activities were conducted in 135 locations in 30 states as follows |
Florida.................. |
37 |
|
Arkansas................ |
2 |
New York............ |
19 |
|
Connecticut............ |
2 |
Virginia................ |
8 |
|
Minnesota.............. |
2 |
South Carolina...... |
6 |
|
Pennsylvania.......... |
2 |
California............. |
5 |
|
Tennessee.............. |
2 |
Colorado.............. |
5 |
|
Illinois.................... |
1 |
Georgia................ |
5 |
|
Indiana................... |
1 |
Louisiana.............. |
5 |
|
Iowa...................... |
1 |
North Dakota....... |
5 |
|
Michigan................ |
1 |
New Jersey......... |
4 |
|
Missouri................. |
1 |
Texas.................. |
4 |
|
Nevada.................. |
1 |
Arizona................ |
3 |
|
North Carolina........ |
1 |
New Mexico........ |
3 |
|
Ohio....................... |
1 |
Oklahoma............ |
3 |
|
Wisconsin............... |
1 |
Washington.......... |
3 |
|
Wyoming................ |
1 |
Our business is divided into four reportable segments: (1) the Retail Division; (2) the National Programs Division; (3) the Services Division; and (4) the Brokerage Division. The Retail Division provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, governmental, professional and individual customers. The National Programs Division is comprised of two units: Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals; and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups and market niches. These programs and products are marketed and sold primarily through independent agencies and agents across the United States. For these programs, we receive an "override commission," which is a commission based upon the commissions generated by these independent agencies. The Services Division provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers' compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets and managed healthcare services. The Brokerage Division markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers. In 2002, we generated commission and fee revenues of $452.3 million. |
|
The following table sets forth a summary of (1) the commission and fee revenues generated by each of our reportable segments for 2002, 2001 and 2000, and (2) the percentage of our total commission and fee revenues represented by each segment for each such period: |
(in thousands, except percentages) |
2002 |
% |
2001 |
% |
2000 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Division(1)....................... |
$342,331 |
75.7% |
$281,118 |
78.2% |
$195,222 |
75.6% |
National Programs Division........ |
57,764 |
12.8 |
42,176 |
11.7 |
34,011 |
13.2 |
Services Division....................... |
28,149 |
6.2 |
24,509 |
6.8 |
21,299 |
8.2 |
Brokerage Division.................... |
24,045 |
5.3 |
11,894 |
3.3 |
7,777 |
3.0 |
Total.................................... |
$452,289 |
100.0% |
$359,697 |
100.0% |
$258,309 |
100.0 |
(1) Numbers and percentages have been restated to give effect to acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting. In addition, we made acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting during those periods, which affect the comparability of results. See "Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations: General" and notes 2 and 3 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for a description of our acquisitions. |
|
DIVISIONS |
|
Retail Division |
|
As of December 31, 2002, our Retail Division operated in 28 states and employed approximately 2,493 persons. Our retail insurance agency business provides a broad range of income products and sources to commercial, governmental, professional and individual customers. The categories of insurance principally sold by us are: Property insurance against physical damage to property and resultant interruption of business or extra expense caused by fire, windstorm or other perils; and Casualty insurance relating to legal liabilities, workers' compensation, commercial and private passenger automobile coverages, and fidelity and surety insurance. We also sell and service group and individual life, accident, disability, health, hospitalization, medical and dental insurance. |
|
No material part of our retail business is attributable to a single client or a few customers. During 2002, commissions and fees from our largest single Retail Division customer represented less than one percent of the Retail Division's total commission and fee revenues. |
|
In connection with the selling and marketing of insurance coverages, we provide a broad range of related services to our customers, such as risk management surveys and analysis, consultation in connection with placing insurance coverages and claims processing. We believe these services are important factors in securing and retaining customers. |
|
National Program Division |
|
As of December 31, 2002, our National Programs Division employed approximately 316 persons. Our National Programs Division consists of two units: Professional Programs and Special Programs. |
|
Professional Programs. Professional Programs provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents. Professional Programs tailors insurance products to the needs of a particular professional group, negotiates policy forms, coverages and commission rates with an insurance company and, in certain cases, secures the formal or informal endorsement of the product by a professional association. The professional groups serviced by the National Programs Division include dentists, lawyers, physicians, optometrists, opticians, insurance agents and real estate agents. The professional medical-related programs are marketed and sold primarily through a national network of independent agencies, while the professional liability programs of our CalSurance operations in Orange, California are marketed and sold directly to our insured customers. We also market a variety of these products through certain of our retail offices. Under agency agreements with the insurance companies that underwrite these programs, we often have authority to bind coverages, subject to established guidelines, to bill and collect premiums and, in some cases, to process claims. |
|
Below are brief descriptions of the programs offered to these major professional groups: |
|
||
|
• |
Dentists: The Professional Protector Plan® is a package insurance policy that provides comprehensive coverage for dentists, dental schools and dental students, including practice protection and professional liability. This program, initiated in 1969, is endorsed by a number of state and local dental societies and is offered in 49 states, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Lawyers: We began marketing lawyers' professional liability insurance in 1973, and the national Lawyer's Protector Plan® was introduced in 1983. This program is presently offered in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Physicians: We market professional liability insurance for physicians, surgeons and other health care providers through a program known as the Physicians Protector Plan®. This program, initiated in 1980, is currently offered in five states. The contract with the underwriting company on this program expires in March 2003. We are actively seeking a replacement carrier, but there is no assurance that one will be found. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Optometrists and Opticians: The Optometric Protector Plan® ("OPP®") and the Optical Services Protector Plan® ("OSPP®") were created in 1973 and 1987, respectively, to provide optometrists and opticians with a package of practice and professional liability coverage. These programs insure optometrists and opticians in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. |
|
|
|
|
• |
CalSurance: CalSurance provides professional liability programs to insurance agents, financial advisors, security broker dealers, real estate brokers, title agents and home inspectors. CalSurance also sells commercial insurance packages directly to customers in certain industry niches, including entertainment, destination resort hotels, Asian business owners, pizza operators, plus others. An important aspect of CalSurance is its Lancer Claims Services which provides specialty claims administrations for insurance companies involved with CalSurance product lines. |
|
|
Special Programs. Special Programs markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups and market niches. All of the Special Programs, except for the Parcel Insurance Plan®, are marketed and sold primarily through independent agents. Parcel Insurance Plan® markets and sells its insurance product directly to the insured customers. Under agency agreements with the insurance companies that underwrite these programs, we often have authority to bind coverages, subject to established guidelines, to bill and collect premiums and, in some cases, to process claims. |
|
|
|
Below are brief descriptions of the Special Programs: |
|
|
|||
|
• |
Florida Intracoastal Underwriters, Limited Company ("FIU") is a managing general agency that specializes in providing insurance coverage for coastal and inland high-value condominiums and apartments. FIU has developed a specialty reinsurance facility to support the underwriting activities associated with these risks. One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries had a 75% ownership interest in FIU through December 31, 2002. Effective January 1, 2003, that subsidiary acquired the remaining 25% ownership interest in FIU. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Parcel Insurance Plan® ("PIP®") is a specialty insurance agency providing insurance coverage to commercial and private shippers for small packages and parcels with insured values of less than $25,000 each. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Program Management Services is a managing general agent that offers unique property and casualty insurance products targeted at governmental entities on a national basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
AFC offers commercial insurance package products to social services organizations in 11 states. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Commercial Programs serves the insurance needs of certain specialty trade/industry groups. Programs offered include: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
• |
Manufacturers Protector Plan®. Introduced in 1997, this program provides specialized coverages for manufacturers, with an emphasis on selected niche markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Wholesalers & Distributors Preferred Program®. Introduced in 1997, this program provides property and casualty protection for businesses principally engaged in the wholesale-distribution industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Railroad Protector Plan®. Also introduced in 1997, this program is designed for contractors, manufacturers and other entities that service the needs of the railroad industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Environmental Protector Plan®. Introduced in 1998, this program provides a variety of specialized coverages primarily to municipal Mosquito Control and Water Control Districts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Food Processors Preferred Program(SM). This program, introduced in 1998, provides property and casualty insurance protection for businesses involved in the handling and processing of various foods. |
|
|
|
||||
During 2001, we discontinued the following Commercial Programs due to loss of underwriting insurance companies: Towing Operators Protector Plan®; Automobile Dealers Protector Plan®; Automobile Transporters Protector Plan®; Automotive Aftermarket Protector Plan®; High-Tech Target Program(SM) and Assisted Living Facilities Protector Plan®. We are currently evaluating the continued viability of these and certain other programs. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Service Division |
|
||||
|
|
||||
At December 31, 2002, our Services Division employed approximately 311 persons and consisted of subsidiaries that provide the following services: (1) insurance-related services as a third-party administrator and consultant for employee health and welfare benefit plans; (2) insurance-related services providing comprehensive risk management and third-party administration to insurance entities and self-funded or fully-insured workers' compensation and liability plans; and (3) certified managed care and utilization management services for both insurance programs and self-funded plans. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
In connection with its employee benefit plan administrative services, the Services Division provides third-party administration and consulting related to benefit plan design and costing, arrangement for the placement of stop-loss insurance and other employee benefit coverages, and settlement of claims. Services Division units also provide utilization management services such as pre-admission review, concurrent/retrospective review, pre-treatment review of certain non-hospital treatment plans and medical and psychiatric case management. In addition to the administration of self-funded health care plans, this unit offers administration of flexible benefit plans, including plan design, employee communication, enrollment and reporting. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
The Services Division's workers' compensation and liability third-party administration includes claim administration, access to major reinsurance markets, cost containment consulting, services for secondary disability and subrogation recoveries and risk management services such as loss control. In 2002, our largest workers' compensation contract represented approximately 33.4% of our workers' compensation third-party administration revenues, or approximately 1.2% of our total commission and fee revenues. In addition, the Services Division provides managed care services certified by the American Accreditation Health Care Commission, which include medical networks, case management and utilization review services. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Brokerage Division |
|
||||
|
|
||||
The Brokerage Division markets excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance to retail agencies primarily in the southeastern United States, as well as throughout the United States, including through our Retail Division. The Brokerage Division represents various U.S. and U.K. surplus lines companies and is also a Lloyd's of London correspondent. In addition to surplus lines insurance companies, the Brokerage Division represents admitted insurance companies for smaller agencies that do not have access to large insurance company representation. Excess and surplus products include commercial automobile, garage, restaurant, builder's risk and inland marine lines. Difficult-to-insure general liability and products liability coverages are a specialty, as is excess workers' compensation coverage. Retail agency business is solicited through mailings and direct contact with retail agency representatives. At December 31, 2002, the Brokerage Division employed approximately 201 persons. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
In September 2001, we established Brown & Brown Re, Inc., a subsidiary based in Stamford, Connecticut that specializes in treaty and facultative reinsurance brokerage services. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Employees |
|
||||
|
|
||||
At December 31, 2002, we had approximately 3,384 employees. We have contracts with our sales employees and certain other employees that include provisions restricting their right to solicit our customers and employees after termination of employment with us. The enforceability of such contracts varies from state to state depending upon state statutes, judicial decisions and factual circumstances. The majority of these contracts are terminable by either party; however, the agreements not to solicit our customers and employees generally continue for a period of two or three years after employment termination. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
None of our employees is represented by a labor union, and we consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Competition |
|
||||
|
|
||||
The insurance agency and brokerage business is highly competitive, and numerous firms actively compete with us for customers and insurance companies. Although we are the largest insurance agency and brokerage headquartered in the southeastern United States and were ranked in 2002, based on 2001 revenues, as the nation's sixth largest by Business Insurance magazine, a number of firms with substantially greater resources and market presence compete with us in the southeastern United States and elsewhere. This situation is particularly pronounced outside of Florida. Competition in the insurance business is largely based on innovation, quality of service and price. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
A number of insurance companies are engaged in the direct sale of insurance, primarily to individuals, and do not pay commissions to third-party agents and brokers. In addition, the Internet continues to be a source for direct placement of personal lines business. To date, such direct writing has had little effect on our operations, primarily because our Retail Division is commercially oriented. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
In addition, to the extent that the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 and regulations recently enacted thereunder permit banks, securities firms and insurance companies to affiliate, the financial services industry may experience further consolidation, which in turn could result in increased competition from diversified financial institutions, including competition for acquisition candidates. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Regulation, Licensing and Agency Contracts |
|
||||
|
|
||||
We or our designated employees must be licensed to act as agents by state regulatory authorities in the states in which we conduct business. Regulations and licensing laws vary in individual states and are often complex. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
The applicable licensing laws and regulations in all states are subject to amendment or reinterpretation by state regulatory authorities, and such authorities are vested in most cases with relatively broad discretion as to the granting, revocation, suspension and renewal of licenses. The possibility exists that we or our employees could be excluded or temporarily suspended from carrying on some or all of our activities in, or otherwise subjected to penalties by, a particular state. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
ITEM 2. |
Properties |
|
|||
|
|
||||
We lease our executive offices, which are located at 220 South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114, and 401 East Jackson Street, Suite 1700, Tampa, Florida 33602. We lease offices at every location with the exception of our; Washington, New Jersey; Dansville, Hornell and Jamestown, New York; and Grand Forks, North Dakota offices, where we own the buildings. In addition, we own buildings in Loreauville and Scott, Louisiana where we no longer have offices, as well as a parcel of undeveloped property outside of Lafayette, Louisiana and an office condominium in Sarasota, Florida. There is a mortgage on the Grand Forks, North Dakota building with an outstanding balance as of December 31, 2002 of $0.1 million. There are no outstanding mortgages on our other owned properties. Set forth below is information relating to our office locations as of December 31, 2002, summarized by business segment: |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Retail Division Office Locations: |
|
||||
|
• |
Arizona: Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson |
|
||
|
• |
Arkansas: Little Rock, Russellville |
|
||
|
• |
California: Brea, Novato, Oakland, Orange, Thousand Oaks |
|
||
|
• |
Colorado: Colorado Springs, Denver, Ft. Collins, Longmont, Steamboat Springs |
|
||
|
• |
Connecticut: Newington |
|
||
|
• |
Florida: Brooksville, Clearwater, Daytona Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. Myers, Ft. Pierce, Jacksonville, Largo, Leesburg, Melbourne, Miami Lakes, Monticello, Naples, Ocala, Orlando, Panama City, Perry, Port Charlotte, Sarasota, St. Petersburg, Tallahassee, Tampa, Titusville, West Palm Beach, Winter Haven |
|
||
|
• |
Georgia: Atlanta, Canton, Rome |
|
||
|
• |
Illinois: Joliet |
|
||
|
• |
Indiana: Indianapolis |
|
||
|
• |
Iowa: Des Moines |
|
||
|
• |
Louisiana: Baton Rouge, Breaux Bridge, Lafayette, Opelousas |
|
||
|
• |
Michigan: Flint |
|
||
|
• |
Minnesota: East Grand Forks, Mankato |
|
||
|
• |
Nevada: Las Vegas |
|
||
|
• |
New Jersey: Clark, Freehold, Parsippany, Washington |
|
||
|
• |
New Mexico: Albuquerque, Roswell, Taos |
|
||
|
• |
New York: Avon, Clifton Park, Dansville, East Greenbush, Endicott, Geneva, Hornell, Ithaca, Jamestown, Naples, Rochester, Rome, Sodus, Spencerport, Syracuse, Wellsville, Williamsville, Wolcott |
|
||
|
• |
North Dakota: Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks, Jamestown, Minot |
|
||
|
• |
Ohio: Toledo |
|
||
|
• |
Oklahoma: Chandler, Pryor |
|
||
|
• |
Pennsylvania: Bethlehem |
|
||
|
• |
South Carolina: Charleston, Georgetown, Greenville, Spartanburg, Union |
|
||
|
• |
Tennessee: Kingsport |
|
||
|
• |
Texas: El Paso, Houston |
|
||
|
• |
Virginia: Bristol, Manassas, Norfolk, Norton, Richlands, Richmond, Salem, Virginia Beach |
|
||
|
• |
Washington: Seattle, Tacoma, Wenatachee |
|
||
|
• |
Wisconsin: Lacrosse |
|
||
|
• |
Wyoming: Cheyenne |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Programs Division Office Locations: |
|
||||
|
• |
Professional Programs: |
|
||
|
|
• California: Orange |
|
||
|
|
• Florida: Tampa |
|
|
• |
Special Programs: |
|
|
• |
Florida: Altamonte Springs, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami Lakes, Plantation, Tampa |
|
|
• |
Missouri: St. Louis |
|
|
• |
New York: Mechanicville |
|
|
• |
Pennsylvania: Bethlehem |
|
|
• |
Texas: San Antonio |
Services Division Office Locations: |
||
|
• |
Florida: Altamonte Springs, Daytona Beach, Orlando, Oviedo |
|
• |
Louisiana: Lafayette |
Brokerage Division Office Locations: |
|
|
• |
Arkansas: Little Rock |
|
|
• |
California: Brea |
|
|
• |
Connecticut: Stamford |
|
|
• |
Florida: Daytona Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, Lake Mary, Orlando, St. Petersburg |
|
|
• |
Georgia: Atlanta |
|
|
• |
New York: Massapequa, Rochester |
|
|
• |
North Carolina: Charlotte |
|
|
• |
Oklahoma: Bartlesville |
|
|
• |
Tennessee: Nashville |
|
|
|
Our operating leases expire on various dates. These leases generally contain renewal options and escalation clauses based on increases in the lessors' operating expenses and other charges. We expect that most leases will be renewed or replaced upon expiration. From time to time, we may have unused space and seek to sublet such space to third parties, depending on the demand for office space in the locations involved. See note 13 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on our lease commitments. |
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
We prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in the action filed on January 19, 2000, in the Superior Court of Henry County, Georgia, captioned Gresham & Associates, Inv. v. Anthony T. Strianese, et al. The complaint named us, certain of our subsidiaries and employees as defendants and alleged, among other things, that we tortuously interfered with contractual relationships and otherwise engaged in anti-competitive activities. The complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $10,000,000. Although the plaintiff has appealed the adverse summary judgment, we expect an affirmation of the judgment by the appellate court. |
|
|
|
We are involved in various other pending or threatened proceedings by or against us or one or more of our subsidiaries that involve routine litigation relating to insurance risks placed by us and other contractual matters. Our management does not believe that any of such pending or threatened proceedings will have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or future operations. |
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during our fourth quarter ended December 31, 2002. |
|
|
|
PART II |
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
|
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol "BRO". The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the intra-day high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape and dividends declared on our common stock. The stock prices and dividends reflect the two-for-one common stock split on November 21, 2001 that was effected as a stock dividend. |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
High |
Low |
Dividends |
2001 First Quarter.......................................... |
$19.96 |
$14.38 |
$0.0375 |
Second Quarter...................................... |
23.05 |
16.95 |
0.0375 |
Third Quarter......................................... |
26.30 |
20.50 |
0.0375 |
Fourth Quarter....................................... |
31.50 |
23.70 |
0.0475 |
2002 |
|
|
|
First Quarter.......................................... |
$36.33 |
$26.03 |
$0.0475 |
Second Quarter...................................... |
37.00 |
30.15 |
0.0475 |
Third Quarter......................................... |
31.80 |
24.00 |
0.0475 |
Fourth Quarter....................................... |
34.80 |
27.40 |
0.0575 |
2003 |
|
|
|
First Quarter.......................................... |
33.81 |
26.75 |
$0.0595 |
The last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 18, 2003 was $30.46 per share. At March 18, 2003, there were 68,096,951 shares of our common stock outstanding, held by approximately 1,090 shareholders of record. |
|
|
|
Information under the caption "Equity Compensation Plans" on page 12 of the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
Information under the caption "Financial Highlights" on page 24 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
Information under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" on pages 25-37 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and equity prices. We are exposed to market risk through our investments, revolving credit line and term loan agreements. |
|
|
|
Our invested assets are held as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, available-for-sale marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit. These investments are subject to interest rate risk and equity price risk. The fair values of our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and certificates of deposit at December 31, 2002 and 2001 approximated their respective carrying values due to their short-term duration and therefore such market risk is not considered to be material. |
|
|
|
We do not actively invest or trade in equity securities. In addition, we generally dispose of any significant equity securities received in conjunction with an acquisition shortly after the acquisition date. However, we have no current intentions to add or dispose of any of the 559,970 common stock shares of Rock-Tenn Company, a publicly-held NYSE company, which we have owned for over ten years. The investment in Rock-Tenn Company accounted for 84% and 85% of the total value of available-for-sale marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Rock-Tenn Company's closing stock price at December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $13.48 and $14.40 respectively. Our exposure to equity price risk is primarily related to the Rock-Tenn Company investment. As of December 31, 2002, the value of the Rock-Tenn Company investment was $7,548,000. |
|
|
|
To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the remaining six years of our seven-year $90 million term loan, on December 5, 2001 we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating rate LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest rate payments at 4.53%. We do not otherwise enter into derivatives, swaps or other similar financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2002, the interest rate swap agreement was as follows: |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
Contractual/ |
Fair Value |
Weighted Average |
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
agreement ...................... |
$64,286 |
$3,339 |
4.53% |
1.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
|
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries, together with the reports thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP appearing on pages 38-66 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial |
|
Disclosure |
|
|
On June 14, 2002, the Company's Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its Audit Committee, decided no longer to engage Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") and decided to engage Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the independent public accountants for the Company. |
|
|
|
Andersen's audit reports on the Company's consolidated financial statements for each of the years ended 2001 and 2000 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. |
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 and through June 14, 2002, there were no disagreements with Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Andersen, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with their report. |
|
|
|
None of the reportable events described under Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurred within Brown's two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through June 19, 2002. The Company provided Andersen with a copy of the above disclosures. A copy of Andersen's letter dated June 19, 2002, stating its agreement with such statements was filed as Exhibit 16 with the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002. |
PART III |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
Information contained under the captions "Management" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" on pages 4-7, and page 10, respectively, of the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
Executive Compensation |
|
|
||
Information contained under the caption "Executive Compensation" on pages 10-13 of the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference; provided, however, that the report of the Compensation Committee on executive compensation, which begins on page 14 thereof, shall not be deemed to be incorporated herein by reference. |
||
|
||
ITEM 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
|
|
|
|
Information contained under the caption "Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners" on pages 2-3 of the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
|
|
|
|
Information contained under the captions "Management - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Executive Compensation - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" on pages 8-10 and 13, respectively, of the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
PART IV |
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
Controls and Procedures. |
|
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation (the "Evaluation"), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures ("Disclosure Controls"). Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, subject to the limitations noted below, our Disclosure Controls are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic Securities and Exchange Commission reports |
|
|
|
Changes in Internal Controls |
|
|
|
We have also evaluated our internal controls for financial reporting, and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation. |
|
|
|
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls |
|
|
|
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. |
|
|
|
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. |
|
|
|
CEO and CFO Certifications |
|
|
|
Appearing immediately following the Signatures section of this report there are Certifications of the CEO and the CFO. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Section 302 Certifications"). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented. |
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
|
|
(a) |
The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of Brown & Brown, Inc. consisting of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Reports of Independent Certified Public Accountants. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules. The Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
EXHIBITS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2a |
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of July 25, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Brown & Brown of Washington, Inc., Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. and the Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form S-4/A filed October 3, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2b |
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of August 10, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Brown & Brown of Washington, Inc., Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. and the Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form S-4/A filed October 3, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3a |
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001), and Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3b |
Bylaws of the Registrant as amended effective as of November 8, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10a |
Amended and Restated Revolving and Term Loan Agreement dated January 3, 2001 by and between the Registrant and SunTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4a to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10a(1) |
Extension of the Term Loan Agreement between the Registrant and SunTrust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10b to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10a(2) |
Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 11, 2000, by and among the Registrant, Riedman Corporation, and Riedman Corporation's shareholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10a(3) |
First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 3, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Riedman Corporation, and Riedman Corporation's shareholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10a(4) |
General Assignment and Bill of Sale, dated January 1, 2001, from Riedman Insurance of Wyoming, Inc. to Brown & Brown of Wyoming, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10b(1) |
Lease of the Registrant for office space at 220 South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida dated August 15, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a(3) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10b(2) |
Lease Agreement for office space at SunTrust Financial Centre, Tampa, Florida, dated February 1995, between Southeast Financial Center Associates, as landlord, and the Registrant, as tenant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a(4) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10b(3) |
Lease Agreement for office space at Riedman Tower, Rochester, New York, dated January 3, 2001, between Riedman Corporation, as landlord, and the Registrant, as tenant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10b(3) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10c(1) |
Loan Agreement between Continental Casualty Company and the Registrant dated August 23, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10d to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10c(2) |
Extension to Loan Agreement, dated August 1, 1998, between the Registrant and Continental Casualty Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10c(2) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10d |
Indemnity Agreement dated January 1, 1979, among the Registrant, Whiting National Management, Inc., and Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10g to Registration Statement No. 33-58090 on Form S-4). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10e |
Agency Agreement dated January 1, 1979 among the Registrant, Whiting National Management, Inc., and Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10h to Registration Statement No. 33-58090 on Form S-4). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10f(1) |
Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated May 6, 1998, between the Registrant and Kenneth E. Hill (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10l to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10f(2) |
Letter Agreement, dated May 6, 1998, between the Registrant and Kenneth E. Hill (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10m to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10g |
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 1999, between the Registrant and J. Hyatt Brown (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10f to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10h |
Portions of Employment Agreement, dated April 28, 1993 between the Registrant and Jim W. Henderson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10m to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10i |
Employment Agreement, dated May 6, 1998 between the Registrant and Kenneth E. Hill (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10k to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10j |
Noncompetition, Nonsolicitation and Confidentiality Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2001 between the Registrant and John R. Riedman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10l to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10k |
Asset Purchase Agreement, effective as of May 1, 2001, by and among Brown & Brown of Missouri, Inc., Parcel Insurance Plan, Inc., Overseas Partners Capital Corp., and Overseas Partners, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10l to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10l |
Asset Purchase Agreement, effective October 1, 2001, by and among Brown & Brown of Lehigh Valley, Inc., Henry S. Lehr, Inc., William H. Lehr, and Patsy A. Lehr (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10m to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10m(1) |
Registrant's 2000 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-43018 on Form S-8 filed on August 3, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10m(2) |
Registrant's Stock Performance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-14925 on Form S-8 filed on October 28, 1996). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10n |
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1999, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 2, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10o |
International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreement dated as of December 5, 2001 between SunTrust Bank and the Registrant and letter agreement dated December 6, 2001, regarding confirmation of interest rate transaction (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10p to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10p |
Asset Purchase Agreement, effective October 3, 2001, by and among Brown & Brown of Lehigh Valley, Inc., Apollo Financial Corporation, William H. Lehr and Patsy A. Lehr (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10q to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10q |
Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, effective November 1, 2002, by and among Brown & Brown. Inc., CalSurance Associates, Inc., United Network of Insurance Services, Inc., Sterling Reinsurance Intermediaries, Inc., Lancer Claims Services Corporation, Donald W. Martin and Renee Martin, as Trustees of the Martin Living Trust U/D/T dated August 14, 1984, as Amended October 22, 1986, and Donald E. Martin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Portions of Registrant's 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders (not deemed "filed" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except for those portions specifically incorporated by reference herein). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
Letter Regarding Change of Certifying Accountant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to Form 8-K filed on June 19, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
Powers of Attorney pursuant to which this Form 10-K has been signed on behalf of certain directors and officers of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K |
||
|
|
|
|
We filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Current report on Form 8-K regarding the announcement of the election of Jim W. Henderson as President and Chief Operating Officer, the assumption of expanded responsibilities by Linda S. Downs, and the elections of Charles H. Lydecker and J. Powell Brown as Regional Executive Vice Presidents, filed on November 15, 2002. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Current report on Form 8-K regarding the announcement that the Company had completed the previously announced asset acquisition of CalSurance Associates, Inc., United Network of Insurance Services, Inc., Sterling Reinsurance Intermediaries, Inc., Lancer Claims Service, Inc., and Chartered Financial Services Corporation, effective November 1, 2002, filed on November 12, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
|
|
|
|
|
BROWN & BROWN, INC. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:___________*_____________ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hyatt Brown |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
||
Date: March 24, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated. |
Signature |
Title |
Date |
|
|
|
* |
Chairman of the Board and |
March 24, 2003 |
J. Hyatt Brown |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
Samuel P. Bell, III |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
Bradley Currey, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
President and Chief Operating |
March 24, 2003 |
Jim W. Henderson |
Officer, Director |
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
David H. Hughes |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
Theodore J. Hoepner |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
Toni Jennings |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
John R. Riedman |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Director |
March 24, 2003 |
Jan E. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Vice President, Treasurer and |
March 24, 2003 |
Cory T. Walker |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal |
|
|
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
*By: |
/S/ LAUREL L. GRAMMIG |
|
Laurel L. Grammig |
|
Attorney-in-Fact |
CERTIFICATIONS |
|||
|
|||
I, J. Hyatt Brown, certify that: |
|||
|
|||
|
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brown & Brown, Inc. ("Registrant"); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) |
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Date: March 24, 2003 |
|||
|
|||
/S/ J. HYATT BROWN |
|||
________________________ |
|||
J. Hyatt Brown |
|||
Chief Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS |
||
|
||
I, Cory T. Walker, certify that: |
||
|
||
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brown & Brown, Inc. ("Registrant"); |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have: |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
|
|
|
c) |
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date. |
|
|
|
5. |
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
|
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls. |
|
|
|
6. |
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
|
|
|
|
Date: March 24, 2003 |
||
|
||
/S/ CORY T. WALKER |
||
________________________________ |
||
Cory T. Walker |
||
Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 3b |
|
AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE AS |
OF NOVEMBER 8, 2002 |
|
BY-LAWS |
BROWN & BROWN, INC. |
|
ARTICLE I |
|
SHAREHOLDERS |
|
Section 1. Annual Meetings of Shareholders |
|
The annual meeting of the Shareholders for the election of the Board of Directors and the transaction of such further business as may come before the meeting shall be held at the Company’s offices on the fourth Thursday of April each year (or in the event such day is a legal holiday, on the day next following which is not a legal holiday), unless by resolution of the Board of Directors in any year a different time is designated. Meetings of the shareholders may be held either within or without the State of Florida. |
|
Section 2. Special Meetings of Shareholders |
|
Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the President or the Board of Directors whenever he or they deem it proper and shall be called by the President or by the Board of Directors upon the written request of shareholders holding a majority of common stock outstanding. Such meetings may be held either within or without the State. |
|
Section 3. Notice of Meetings of Shareholders |
|
A notice of each meeting of shareholders, signed by the Secretary, shall be mailed to each shareholder having the right and entitled to vote at such meeting, at his address as it appears on the records of the Corporation, not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date set for the meeting. If any such shareholder’s address is unknown, notice shall be given by advertising once, in some newspaper published in Tampa, Florida within the time above specified for served or mailed notice. If any shareholder shall transfer any of his stock after notice, it shall not be necessary to notify the transferee. Any shareholder, however, may waive notice of any meeting, either before, at or after such meeting. |
|
Section 4. Qualification of Voters |
|
The directors may fix a date not more than 70 days prior to the date set for such meeting as the record date of which the shareholders of record who have the right to and are entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting and any adjournment thereof shall be determined. |
|
Section 5. Proxy and Voting |
|
Shareholders who are qualified to vote may vote at any meeting, either in person or, if absent, by proxy in writings which shall be filed with the Secretary of the meeting before being voted. Each common shareholder shall be entitled to as many votes as he holds shares of stock. |
|
Section 6. Quorum |
|
At any meeting of the shareholders a majority in interest of all the common stock issued and outstanding represented by shareholders of record in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A less interest may adjourn any meeting and the meeting may be held as adjourned without further notice, provided however, that directors shall not be elected at meetings so adjourned. Any question may be considered and acted upon at an annual meeting of the shareholders, but no question not stated in the call for a special meeting shall be acted upon thereat except by the written consent to the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock, said consent to be filed with the records of the Corporation. |
|
ARTICLE II |
|
BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
Section 1. Number and Qualifications of Directors |
|
The Board of Directors shall consist of nine (9) in number to be elected annually at the meeting of the shareholders by a majority of the shares voted. The number may be increased or diminished from time to time, by resolution of the Board of Directors, but shall never be less than three (3). It shall not be necessary for directors to be shareholders, but all directors shall be of full age and at least one shall be a citizen of the United States. A director shall hold office until his successor is elected and has qualified. |
|
Section 2. Meetings of Directors |
|
The Board of Directors shall hold its regular and its special meetings at such times and places, within or without the state, as they deem to be to the best interest of the Corporation. The Board of Directors shall fix the time and place of its regular meetings. The President or any two directors may call special meetings of the Board of Directors but the President shall call a special meeting or meetings whenever requested in writing so to do by the holders of a majority of the stock then outstanding. The Board of Directors may conduct meetings by means of a conference telephone hookup. |
|
Section 2A. Action by Written Consent |
|
Any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the Board of Directors or of a Committee may be taken by written consent, without a meeting, if the action is taken by all of the members of the Board or the Committee. The action shall be evidenced by one or more written consents describing the action taken and shall be signed by each director or Committee member. |
|
Section 3. Notice of Meetings of Board of Directors |
|
After the Board of Directors has determined the time and place for regular meetings no notice thereof need be given. Notice of special meetings, stating the time and place thereof, shall be given to each director by mailing the same special delivery and, if it will expedite the notice, airmail, at his residence or business address at least two (2) days before the meeting, or by delivering the same to him personally or telegraphing or telecopying the same to him at his residence or business address not later than the day before the day on which the meeting is to be held, unless in case of emergency the President shall prescribe a shorter notice to be given personally, by telephone, telegram or by telecopy. The meeting of the Board of Directors for the election of officers may be held without notice immediately after the annual meeting of the shareholders and at the same place. Any director may waive notice of any meeting of the Board of Directors either before, at or after such meeting. |
|
Section 4. Powers of Directors |
|
The Board of Directors shall have the entire management of the business of the Corporation. In the management and control of the property, business and affairs of the Corporation, the Board of Directors is hereby vested with all the powers possessed by the Corporation itself, so far as this delegation of authority is not inconsistent with the laws of the State of Florida, with the Certificate of Incorporation or with these By-Laws. The Board of Directors shall have the power to determine what constitutes net earnings, profits, and surplus, respectively, what amount shall be reserved for working capital and for any other purposes and what amount shall be declared as dividends, and such determination by the Board of Directors shall be final and conclusive. The Board of Directors shall also have power to determine what amounts, if any, shall be borrowed by the Corporation and upon what terms, conditions or security and shall be authorized to incur such indebtedness as they may deem necessary and to authorize the execution thereof by the officers of the Corporation. The Board of Directors may, by resolution, designate two or more of their number to constitute an executive committee, who, to the extent provided in such resolution, shall have and may exercise the powers of the Board of Directors. |
|
Section 5. Vacancies |
|
When for any reason the office of a director shall become vacant, the remaining directors shall by a majority vote elect a successor who shall hold office until his successor is elected and has qualified. Vacancies resulting from an increase in the number of directors may be filled in the same manner. |
|
Section 6. Quorum of Directors |
|
A majority of the members of the Board of Directors is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but a lesser number (not less than two) may adjourn any meeting and the meeting may be held as adjourned without further notice. When a quorum is present at any meeting, the act of the majority of the directors present shall be the act of f the Board of Directors and this shall be true even if no notice of such meeting shall have been given, provided a majority of the Board shall waive, as hereinabove provided, the giving of such notice. |
|
Section 7. Resignation or Removal |
|
Any director may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board of Directors, the President or the Secretary. Any such resignation shall take effect at the time specified therein, or if the time not be specified therein, upon its acceptance by the Board of Directors. The shareholders at any meeting called for the purpose by vote of a majority of the common stock issued and outstanding may remove from office any director elected by the shareholders or Board of Directors and elect his successor. |
|
ARTICLE III |
|
OFFICERS |
|
Section 1. Election and Qualification |
|
The Officers of this Corporation shall consist of a Chairman of the Board, a President, a Vice President, a Secretary and a Treasurer and one of more additional Vice Presidents, one or more Assistant Secretaries, one or more Assistant Treasurers or such other officers as the Board of Directors may provide. All of such officers shall be elected by the Board of Directors immediately after the annual meeting of the shareholders. None of the officers need be directors. The same person may hold more than one office, except those of President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary. The Board of Directors shall have the authority to fill any vacancy in any office. |
|
The Board of Directors shall have full authority to fix the compensation of all officers. All officers shall hold office until their successors are elected and have qualified. |
|
Section 2. Chairman of the Board |
|
The Chairman of the Board shall be the chief executive officer of the Corporation and shall preside at all meetings of the shareholders and shall preside at meetings of the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board, President or Vice President, unless some other person is specifically authorized by vote of the Board of Directors, shall sign all Certificates of stocks, bonds, deeds, mortgages, leases, or any other written instruments of the Corporation. He shall perform all the duties commonly incident to his office and shall perform such other duties as the Board of Directors shall designate. |
|
Section 2A. President |
|
The President shall preside at meetings of the shareholders and/or directors in the absence, sickness or other disability of the Chairman of the Board. The President shall perform all the duties commonly incident to his office and shall perform such other duties as the Board of Directors shall designate. |
|
Section 3. Vice President |
|
The Vice President shall perform the duties and have the powers of the President (other than those as specified as duties of the Chairman of the Board) during the absence, sickness, or other disability of the President. In addition, he shall perform such other duties and have such other powers as the Board of Directors shall designate. |
|
Section 4. Secretary |
|
The Secretary shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings of the shareholders and the Board of Directors and shall perform all the duties commonly incident to his office and shall perform such other duties and have such other powers as the Board of Directors shall designate. The Secretary shall have charge of the Corporate Seal and shall, if requested to do so, attest written instruments of the Corporation executed by the President or the Chairman the Board and affix the Corporate Seal thereto. In the absence of the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary shall perform the aforesaid duties. |
|
Section 5. Treasurer |
|
The Treasurer, subject to the order of the Board of Directors, shall have the care and custody of the money, funds, valuable papers and documents of the Corporation and shall have and exercise under the supervision of the Board of Directors all the powers and duties commonly incident to his office. He shall keep accurate accounts of the Corporation’s transactions which shall be the property of the Corporation. |
|
Section 6. Resignation and Removal |
|
Any officer of the Corporation may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board of Directors, the President or the Secretary of the Corporation. Any such resignation shall take effect at the time specified therein or if the time be not specified therein upon its acceptance by the Board of Directors. The shareholders at any meeting called for the purpose by vote of a majority of the stock issued and outstanding may remove from office any officer elected or appointed by the Board of Directors and elect or appoint his successor. The Board of Directors by vote of not less than a majority of the entire Board may remove from office any officer or agent elected or appointed by it. |
|
ARTICLE IV |
|
STOCK |
|
Section 1. Certificate of Stock |
|
Certificates shall be signed by the Chairman of the Board or the President and the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and sealed with the seal of the Corporation. The seal may be facsimile, engraved or printed. When such Certificate is signed by a transfer agent or by a registrar, the signature of any of those officers named herein may be facsimile. Shares of stock may be transferable only by the registered holder thereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing at the office of an authorized transfer agent of the Corporation upon the surrender of the certificate or certificates for such shares. |
|
Section 2. Stock Register |
|
A stock book, stock records or register shall be kept at the office of the Corporation in Florida, or in the office of one or more of its transfer agents or registrars, containing the names, alphabetically arranged, with the address, of every shareholder, showing the number of shares of stock held of record by him. If the stock records are kept in the office of a transfer agent or registrar, the Corporation shall keep at its office in Florida copies of the stock list prepared from the stock records and sent to it from time to time by said transfer agent or registrar. |
|
Section 3. Defaced or Mutilated Stock Certificates |
|
A new certificate may be issued in lieu of any certificate previously issued that may be defaced or mutilated, upon surrender for cancellation of the part of the old certificate sufficient, in the opinion of the Secretary, to protect the Corporation against loss or liability. |
|
Section 4. Loss of Stock Certificates |
|
In case of loss of any certificate of stock, the owner, before obtaining a duplicate thereof, shall be required to make affidavit that the stock has been lost, stolen or destroyed, describing the same accurately, which affidavit shall be filed with the Treasurer and shall be further required to give to the Corporation a bond or indemnity agreement satisfactory to the Board of Directors. |
|
ARTICLE V |
|
SEAL |
|
Section 1. Description of Seal |
|
The corporate seal of the Corporation shall bear the words BROWN & BROWN, INC., and the word “FLORIDA”, which shall be between two concentric circles, and on the inside the inner circle shall be the words “CORPORATE SEAL” and figures “1959”, an impression of the said seal appearing on the margin hereof. |
|
ARTICLE VI |
|
AMENDMENTS |
|
Section 1. Method of Amendment or Change |
|
These By-Laws may be amended or repealed and additional By-Laws added or adopted by a majority vote of the entire Board of Directors so long as the proposed action is not inconsistent with any By-Laws which may have been adopted by any shareholders meeting by a vote of the majority of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Corporation. These By-Laws may be amended or repealed at any shareholders meeting by a vote of the majority of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Corporation. |
|
ARTICLE VII |
|
MISCELLANEOUS |
|
Section 1. Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
|
Every person who now is or hereafter may be a director or officer of this Corporation, or a director or officer of any other corporation serving as such at the request of this Corporation because of this Corporation’s interest as a shareholder or creditor of such other corporation, shall be indemnified by this Corporation against all costs and amounts of liability therefor and expenses, including counsel fees, reasonably incurred by or imposed upon him in connection with or resulting from any action, suit, proceeding or claim of whatever nature to which he is or shall be made a party by reason of his being or having been a director or officer of this Corporation or for such other corporation (whether or not he is such director or such officer at the time he is made a party to such action, suit, proceeding or claim or at the time such costs, expenses, amounts or liability therefor are incurred by or imposed upon him), provide that such indemnification shall not apply with respect to any matter as to which such director or officer shall be finally adjudged in such action, suit, proceeding or claim to have been individually guilty of gross negligence or wilful malfeasance in the performance of his duty as such director or officer and provided further that the indemnification herein provided shall, with respect to any settlement of any such suit, action, proceeding or claim, include reimbursement of any amounts paid and expenses reasonably incurred in settling any such suit, action, proceeding or claim when, in the judgment of the Board of Directors of this Corporation, such settlement and reimbursement appeared to be for the best interests of this Corporation. The foregoing right of indemnification shall be in addition to and not exclusive of any and all other rights as to which any such director or officer may be entitled under any agreement, vote of shareholders or others. |
|
Section 2. Validity of Certain Contracts |
|
No contract other transaction between this Corporation and any other association, firm corporation (whether or not a majority of the ownership or capital stock of such other association, firm or corporation shall be owned by this Corporation), shall in any way be affected or invalidated by the fact that any of the directors or officers this Corporation are pecuniarily or otherwise interest in, or are directors or officer such other association, firm or corporation; any director of officer of this Corporation, individually, may be a party to or may be pecuniarily or otherwise interested in any contract or transaction of this Corporation; and any director of this Corporation who is also a director of officer of such other corporation, or who is so interested, may be counted in determinate into existence of a quorum at the meeting of the Board Directors of this Corporation which shall authorize or confirm any such contract or transaction and may vote thereat to authorize or confirm any such contract or transaction with like force and effect as if he were not such director officer of such other corporation or not so interested; and each and every person who may become a director or officer of this Corporation is hereby relieve from any liability that might otherwise exist from thus contracting with this Corporation of the benefit of himself or any person, firm, association or corporation in which he may be in any way - interested; provided, however, in any said contract or transaction there shall be an absence of actual fraud |
|
- END - |
|
|
|
|
||
(a) |
If to Buyer, to |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Brown & Brown, Inc. |
|
||
|
|
220 S. Ridgewood Avenue |
|
||
|
|
Daytona Beach, Florida 32114 |
|
||
|
|
Telecopy No.: (386) 239-5729 |
|
||
|
|
Attn: Jim W. Henderson |
|
||
|
|
Regional Executive Vice President |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
With a copy to |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Brown & Brown, Inc. |
|||
|
|
401 E. Jackson Street, Suite 1700 |
|||
|
|
Tampa, Florida 33602 |
|||
|
|
Telecopy No.: (813) 222-4464 |
|||
|
|
Attn: Laurel L. Grammig, Esq. |
|||
|
|
General Counsel |
|||
|
|
|
(b) |
If to Sellers, the Shareholder or Martin, to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19191 South Vermont Avenue |
|
|
Suite 770 |
|
|
Torrance, CA 90502 |
|
|
Fax (310) 819-3311 |
|
|
Attention: Donald E. Martin |
|
|
|
|
With a copy to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latham & Watkins |
|
|
135 Commonwealth Drive |
|
|
Menlo Park, CA 94025 |
|
|
Telecopy No.: (650) 463-2600 |
|
|
Attn: Patrick Pohlen, Esq. |
|
Section 10.2 Use of Term "Knowledge". With respect to the term "Knowledge" as used herein, (a) Martin shall be deemed to have "Knowledge" of a particular fact or other matter if he is actually aware of such fact or other matter, or reasonably should be aware of such fact or other matter; (b) a Seller or Shareholder shall be deemed to have "Knowledge" of a particular fact or other matter if Martin, Masters or James Adams is actually aware of such fact or other matter, or reasonably should be aware of such fact or other matter; and (b) Buyer shall be deemed to have "Knowledge" of a particular fact or other matter if J. Hyatt Brown, Jim W. Henderson, Cory Walker or Rich Freebourn is actually aware of such fact or other matter, or reasonably should be aware of such fact or other matter. |
|
Section 10.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. |
|
Section 10.4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the Schedules, Exhibits, and other documents and instruments delivered pursuant to this Agreement) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements (including, without limitation, the Original Agreement) and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. |
|
Section 10.5 Assignment; No Third Party Rights. Subject to Section 6.7 hereof, neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests, or obligations hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Each of the provisions of this Agreement is for the sole and exclusive benefit of the parties hereto. Nothing in this Agreement is to be construed to give any Person other than the parties to this Agreement any legal or equitable right under or with respect to this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement. |
|
Section 10.6 Joint Efforts. This Agreement is the result of the joint efforts and negotiations of the parties hereto, with each party being represented, or having the opportunity to be represented, by legal counsel of its own choice, and no singular party is the author or drafter of the provisions hereof. Each of the parties assumes joint responsibility for the form and composition of this Agreement and each party agrees that this Agreement shall be interpreted as though each of the parties participated equally in the composition of this Agreement and each and every provision and part hereof. The parties agree that the rule of judicial interpretation to the effect that any ambiguity or uncertainty contained in an agreement is to be construed against the party that drafted the agreement shall not be applied in the event of any disagreement or dispute arising out of this Agreement. |
|
Section 10.7 Headings. All paragraph headings herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not modify or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. |
|
Section 10.8 Severability. In the event that any provision, covenant, section, subsection, paragraph, or any portion thereof, of this Agreement is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, either in whole or in part, the legality, validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions, covenants, sections, subsections, paragraphs, or portions thereof shall not be affected thereby, and each such provision, covenant, section, subsection, paragraph, or any portion thereof shall remain valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. |
|
Section 10.9 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. The prevailing party in any Proceeding brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in investigating and pursuing such action, both at the trial and appellate levels. |
|
Section 10.10 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with internal Florida law without regard to conflicts-of-laws principles that would require the application of any other law. |
|
Section 10.11 Amendment; Waiver. This Agreement may not be amended, or any provision waived, except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties. |
|
Section 10.11 Bulk Sales Law. The parties hereto agree to waive any rights they may have against each other as a result of the failure of any party to comply with the provisions of any applicable laws of any state relating to the bulk sale of assets which may be applicable to the transactions contemplated hereby. |
|
|
* * * * * * * * * * |
|
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank – Signature Pages Follow] |
|
|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed or caused this Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first written above. |
|
BUYER: |
|
|
|
|
|
BROWN & BROWN, INC. |
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ THOMAS M. DONEGAN, JR. |
Name: |
Thomas M. Donegan, Jr. |
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
SELLERS: |
|
|
|
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
Name: |
Donald E. Martin |
Title: |
Chairman |
|
|
UNITED NETWORK OF INSURANCE |
|
SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
Name: |
Donald E. Martin |
Title: |
Chairman |
|
|
STERLING REINSURANCE |
|
INTERMEDIARIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
Name: |
Donald E. Martin |
Title: |
Chairman |
|
|
LANCER CLAIMS SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
Name: |
Donald E. Martin |
Title: |
Chairman |
|
|
|
|
CHARTERED FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|
CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
Name: |
Donald E. Martin |
Title: |
Chairman, President & Chief Executive |
|
Officer |
|
|
SHAREHOLDER: |
|
|
|
MARTIN LIVING TRUST U/D/T DATED |
|
AUGUST 14, 1984, AS AMENDED |
|
OCTOBER 22, 1986 |
|
SHAREHOLDER: |
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
Name: |
Donald E. Martin |
Title: |
Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ RENEE MARTIN |
Name: |
Renee Martin |
Title: |
Trustee |
|
|
MARTIN: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ DONALD E. MARTIN |
|
Donald E. Martin, individually |
|
|
|||
|
SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS |
|||
|
|
|||
Schedule 1.1(a): |
|
Commercial Book of Business |
|
|
Schedule 1.1(b): |
|
Tangible Property |
|
|
Schedule 1.1(c): |
|
Seller Contracts |
|
|
Schedule 1.1(f): |
|
Risk Purchasing Groups |
|
|
Schedule 1.1(g): |
|
Insurance Policies |
|
|
Schedule 1.2(i): |
|
VISA Participants |
|
|
Schedule 1.2(j): |
|
Personal Effects |
|
|
Schedule 1.3(a)(iv) |
|
Employee Bonuses |
|
|
Schedule 1.4(c): |
|
Allocation Schedule |
|
|
Schedule 3.1: |
|
Good Standing Jurisdictions |
|
|
Schedule 3.6(a): |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
Schedule 3.6(c): |
|
Undisclosed Liabilities |
|
|
Schedule 3.7: |
|
Certain Changes and Events |
|
|
Schedule 3.8(a): |
|
Encumbrances |
|
|
Schedule 3.8(b): |
|
Revenues by Carrier for Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2002 |
|
|
Schedule 3.8(d): |
|
Insurance Captive Entities |
|
|
Schedule 3.9: |
|
List of Claims and Litigation |
|
|
Schedule 3.14: |
|
Employment Agreements and Independent Contractor Agreements |
|
|
Schedule 3.15: |
|
Employee Benefit Plans |
|
|
Schedule 3.16(c): |
|
Owned Intellectual Property Assets |
|
|
Schedule 6.16: |
|
Third-Party Consents |
|
|
Schedule 6.18: |
|
Employees to be Offered Employment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A: |
|
Bill of Sale |
|
|
Exhibit B: |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement |
|
|
Exhibit C: |
|
Martin Employment Agreement |
|
|
Exhibit D: |
|
Masters Employment Agreement |
|
EXHIBIT 13 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data |
2002 |
|
Percent |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees (2) |
$452,289 |
|
25.7 |
|
$359,697 |
|
$258,309 |
|
$231,437 |
|
$211,722 |
|
Total revenues |
$455,742 |
|
24.9 |
|
$365,029 |
|
$265,405 |
|
$237,523 |
|
$216,790 |
|
Total expenses |
$321,078 |
|
16.9 |
|
$274,551 |
|
$211,341 |
|
$190,021 |
|
$174,617 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and minority interest |
$134,664 |
|
48.8 |
|
$90,478 |
|
$54,064 |
|
$47,502 |
|
$42,173 |
|
Net income |
$83,122 |
|
54.2 |
|
$53,913 |
|
$32,793 |
|
$28,271 |
|
$25,146 |
|
Net income per share (diluted) |
$1.22 |
|
43.5 |
|
$0.85 |
|
$0.53 |
|
$0.46 |
|
$0.41 |
|
Weighted average number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding (diluted) |
68,043 |
|
7.6 |
|
63,222 |
|
62,091 |
|
61,655 |
|
61,524 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
$0.2000 |
|
25.0 |
|
$0.1600 |
|
$0.1350 |
|
$0.1150 |
|
$0.1025 |
|
Total assets |
$754,349 |
|
54.3 |
|
$488,737 |
|
$324,677 |
|
$286,416 |
|
$285,028 |
|
Long-term debt |
$57,585 |
|
(26.4) |
|
$78,195 |
|
$10,660 |
|
$10,905 |
|
$24,522 |
|
Shareholders' equity (3) |
$391,590 |
|
123.4 |
|
$175,285 |
|
$118,372 |
|
$100,355 |
|
$82,073 |
(1) All share and per share information has been restated to give effect to the two-for-one common stock split that became effective November 21, 2001, the two-for-one common stock split that became effective August 23, 2000 and the three-for-two common stock split that became effective February 27, 1998. Each stock split was effected as a stock dividend. Prior years' results have been restated to give effect to acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting. In addition, we made acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting during those periods, which affect the comparability of results. See "Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations: General" and notes 2 and 3 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for a description of our acquisitions in 2002, 2001 and 2000. |
|
(2) See Notes 2 and 3 to consolidated financial statements for information regarding business purchase transactions which impact the comparability of this information. |
|
(3) Shareholders' equity as of December 31,2002,2001,2000,1999,1998 and 1997 included net increases of $2,106,000,$4,393,000,$2,495,000,$4,922,000,$5,540,000 and $6,744,000, respectively, as a result of the Company 's applications of SFAS 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" and SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities." |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
GENERAL |
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to those consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report. |
|
We are a general insurance agency and brokerage headquartered in Daytona Beach and Tampa, Florida. Since 1993, our stated corporate objective has been to increase our net income per share by at least 15% every year. We have increased revenues from $95.6 million in 1993 (as originally stated, without giving effect to any subsequent acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting) to $455.7 million in 2002, a compound annual growth rate of 19.0%. In the same period, we increased net income from $8.0 million (as originally stated, without giving effect to any subsequent acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting) to $83.1 million in 2002, a compound annual growth rate of 29.7%.We have also increased net income per share 15.0% or more for ten consecutive years, excluding the effect of a one-time investment gain of $1.3 million in 1994 and favorable adjustments to our income tax reserves of $0.7 million in 1994 and $0.5 million in 1995. Since 1993, excluding the historical impact of poolings, our pre-tax margins (income before income taxes and minority interest) improved in all but one year, and in that year, the pre-tax margin was essentially flat. These improvements have resulted primarily from net new business growth (new business production offset by lost business) and continued operating efficiencies. Our revenue growth in 2002 was driven by a general increase in premium rates, stronger net new business growth and the acquisition of 32 agency entities with annualized revenues of approximately $62.0 million. |
|
Our revenues are comprised principally of commissions paid by insurance companies, commissions and fees paid directly by customers and investment income. Commission revenues generally represent a percentage of the premium paid by the insured and are materially affected by fluctuations in both premium rate levels charged by insurance underwriters and the insureds' underlying "insurable exposure units," which are units that insurers use to measure or express insurance exposed to risk (such as property values, sales and payroll levels) so as to determine what premium to charge the policyholder. These premium rates are established by insurance companies based upon many factors, including reinsurance rates, none of which we control. Beginning in 1987 and continuing through 1999, revenues were adversely influenced by a consistent decline in premium rates resulting from intense competition among property and casualty insurers for market share. Among other factors, this condition of a prevailing decline in premium rates, commonly referred to as a "soft market," generally resulted in flat to reduced commissions on renewal business. The effect of this softness in rates on our revenues was somewhat offset by our acquisitions and net new business production. As a result of increasing "loss ratios" (the comparison of incurred losses plus adjustment expense against earned premiums) of insurance companies through 1999, there was a general increase in premium rates beginning in the first quarter of 2000 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2002. Although premium rates vary by line of business, geographical region, insurance company and specific underwriting factors, we believe this was the first time since 1987 that we operated in an environment of increased premiums for three consecutive years. While we cannot predict the timing or extent of premium pricing changes as a result of market fluctuations or their effect on our operations in the future, we believe that premium rates will continue to increase through at least 2003. |
|
The volume of business from new and existing customers, fluctuations in insurable exposure units and changes in general economic and competitive conditions further impact our revenues. For example, stagnant rates of inflation and the general decline of economic activity in recent years have generally limited the increases in the values of insurable exposure units. Conversely, the increasing costs of litigation settlements and awards have caused some customers to seek higher levels of insurance coverage. Still, our revenues continue to grow through an intense focus on net new business growth and acquisitions. We anticipate that results of operations for 2003 will continue to be influenced by these competitive and economic conditions. |
|
We also earn "contingent commissions," which are revenue-sharing commissions from insurance companies based upon the volume and the growth and/or profitability of the business placed with such companies during the prior year. These commissions are primarily received in the first and second quarters of each year, and over the last three years, have averaged approximately 6.1% of the previous year's total commissions and fees. Contingent commissions are included in our total commissions and fees in the consolidated statements of income in the year received. The term "core commissions and fees" excludes contingent commissions and represents the revenues earned directly from each specific insurance policy sold or from fee-based services rendered. |
|
Fee revenues are generated primarily by our Services Division, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers' compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets and managed healthcare services. In each of the past three years, fee revenues generated by the Services Division have averaged approximately 6.9% of our total commissions and fees. |
|
Investment income consists primarily of interest earnings on premiums and advance premiums collected and held in a fiduciary capacity before being remitted to insurance companies. Our policy is to invest available funds in high-quality, short-term fixed income investment securities. Investment income also includes gains and losses realized from the sale of investments. |
|
ACQUISITIONS AND THE IMPACT OF THE POOLING-OF-INTERESTS METHOD OF ACCOUNTING |
|
During 2002, we acquired the assets and certain liabilities of 26 general insurance agencies, several books of business (customer accounts) and the outstanding stock of six general insurance agencies in transactions all accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. |
|
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations," which requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method. This change in accounting rules was the impetus for many of our acquisitions in 2001. During 2001, we acquired the following 12 agency groups in stock-for-stock transactions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting: |
· |
The Huval Companies |
· |
Spencer & Associates, Inc. and SAN of East Central Florida, Inc. |
· |
The Young Agency, Inc. |
· |
Layne & Associates, Ltd. |
· |
Agency of Insurance Professionals, Inc., CompVantage Insurance Agency, LLC and Agency of Indian Programs Insurance, LLC |
· |
Finwall & Associates Insurance, Inc. |
· |
The Connelly Insurance Group, Inc. |
· |
The Benefit Group, Inc. |
· |
Logan Insurance Agency, Inc. and Automobile Insurance Agency of Virginia, Inc. |
· |
Froehlich-Paulson-Moore, Inc. and M&J Buildings, LLC |
· |
McKinnon & Mooney, Inc. |
· |
Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. |
We also acquired the assets of 13 general insurance agencies, several books of business (customer accounts) and the outstanding stock of two general insurance agencies in transactions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. |
|
During 2000, we acquired the following four agency groups in stock-for-stock transactions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting: |
· |
Bowers, Schumann & Welch |
· |
The Flagship Group, Ltd. |
· |
WMH, Inc. and Huffman & Associates, Inc. |
· |
Mangus Insurance & Bonding, Inc. |
We also acquired the assets of five general insurance agencies, several books of business and the outstanding stock of two general insurance agencies in transactions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. |
|
The revenues and expenses of entities that were acquired and accounted for under the purchase method of accounting are recognized only from the date of acquisition, and therefore do not impact our previously reported historical results. However, during 2001 and prior years when acquisitions could be accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method, the applicable accounting rules require that our consolidated financial statements be restated for all prior periods to include the results of operations, financial positions and cash flows of those entities acquired. Because most of the pooled entities were operated as privately held companies that paid significant year-end bonuses and compensation to their principals and owners during the periods prior to our acquisition of such entities, the combination of their lower net income results with our results diluted our historically reported profit margins, defined as income before income taxes and minority interest as a percentage of total revenues. As restated, our profit margins were 24.8% and 20.4% in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Without giving effect to any acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method in the year of acquisition or in any prior year, our profit margins were 27.9% and 27.4% in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Our 2002 profit margin reflects a full year of operating results not affected by any pooling-of-interest restatement and is therefore the most representative of the ongoing profit margin relationship and expectations of the three years presented. |
|
(See Notes 2 and 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 for a description of our acquisitions.) |
|
The following discussion and analysis regarding results of operations and liquidity and capital resources should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. |
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR |
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
2002, 2001 and 2000 |
|
COMMISSIONS AND FEES |
|
Commissions and fees increased 26% in 2002, 39% in 2001 and 12% in 2000. Core commissions and fees increased 12.1% in 2002, 11.3% in 2001 and 11.1% in 2000, which excludes commissions and fees generated from acquired operations that were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and divested operations. These results reflect stronger premium rate increases that began in the first quarter of 2000 and continued through 2002. |
|
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
Investment income decreased to $2.9 million in 2002, compared with $3.7 million in 2001 and $4.9 million in 2000. The decrease in 2002 was primarily a result of the substantially lower investments yields earned during the year even though our available investment cash balances increased as a result of the $149.4 million net proceeds raised in our March 2002 follow-on common stock offering. The decrease in 2001 was primarily a result of lower available investment cash balances due to the higher level of acquisition activity, although declining investment yields also contributed to reduced income. Investment income also included gains of approximately $0.1 million in 2002, $0.3 million in 2001 and $0.2 million in 2000 realized from the sale of investments in various equity securities and partnership interests. |
|
OTHER INCOME |
|
Other income consists primarily of gains and losses from the sale and disposition of assets. In 2002, gains of $0.7 million were recognized from the sale of customer accounts. Gains from the sale of customer accounts were $0.8 million in 2001 and $0.1 million in 2000. |
|
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS |
|
Employee compensation and benefits increased approximately 20% in 2002, 25% in 2001 and 14% in 2000, primarily as a result of acquisitions and an increase in commissions paid to new and existing employees. Employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenues was 49% in 2002, 51% in 2001 and 56% in 2000. The percentages were higher in 2001 and 2000 due to higher compensation and year-end bonuses paid to the principals and owners of pooled entities prior to the dates of acquisition. We had approximately 3,384 full-time employees at December 31, 2002, compared with approximately 3,000 at December 31, 2001 and approximately 2,140 at December 31, 2000. |
|
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
Other operating expenses increased 17% in 2002, 28% in 2001, and 6% in 2000. However, other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 15% in 2002 from 16% in 2001 and 17% in 2000. However, the continuing decline in other operating expenses, expressed as a percentage of total revenues, is attributable to the effective cost containment measures brought about by an initiative designed to identify areas of excess expense, and to the fact that, in an increasing premium rate environment, certain significant other operating expenses such as office rent, office supplies and telephone costs, increase at a slower rate than commission and fee revenues increase during the same period. |
|
DEPRECIATION |
|
Depreciation increased 11% in 2002, 6% in 2001 and 5% in 2000. These increases were primarily due to the purchase of new computer equipment and the depreciation associated with acquired assets. |
|
AMORTIZATION |
|
Amortization expense decreased $1.8 million, or 11%, in 2002, primarily due to the elimination of goodwill amortization in accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" but offset by the increased amortization of identifiable intangible assets from new acquisitions consummated in 2002 and late 2001. Amortization expense increased $6.6 million, or 72%, in 2001, and $0.9 million, or 11%, in 2000 due to the additional amortization of intangibles as a result of new acquisitions. (See Notes 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 for additional analysis of amortization expense.) |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
Interest expense decreased $1.0 million, or 18%, in 2002, as a result of reduced outstanding debt. In 2001, interest expense increased $4.4 million, or 350%, over 2000, primarily as a result of a $90 million term loan obtained in January 2001 to acquire the insurance agency business-related assets of Riedman Corporation. Effective January 2, 2002, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to lock in an effective fixed interest rate of 4.53% for the remaining six years of the term loan, excluding our "credit risk spread" (additional interest paid to offset risk of default) between 0.5% and 1.0%. The decrease in 2000 was the result of reduced outstanding debt. |
|
NON-CASH STOCK GRANT COMPENSATION |
|
Non-cash stock grant compensation expense represents the expense required to be recorded under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," relating to our stock performance plan, which is more fully described in note 11 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
The annual cost of this stock performance plan increases only when our average stock price over a 20-trading-day period increases by increments of 20% or more from the price at the time of the original grant, or when more shares are granted and the stock price increases. |
|
During 2001, after the first vesting condition for most of the previously granted performance stock was satisfied as a result of increases in our 20-trading-day average stock price, we granted additional shares of performance stock. With the awards granted in 2001 and the increase in our stock price since the grant date, the expense for the stock performance plan increased to $3.8 million in 2002, from $2.0 million in 2001 and $0.5 million in 2000. Additionally, in 2002, $0.7 million was expensed due to the accelerated vesting of some performance stock shares as a result of the deaths of two employees. |
|
Since the first vesting condition for the performance stock grants issued in 2001 was satisfied in 2002 by reaching a 20-trading-day average stock price of $35.00, we intend to issue another set of performance stock grants in 2003 at a grant price per share of $35.00. There will be no expense relating to this set of performance stock grants until the 20- trading-day average performance stock grant price exceeds the $35.00 stock price by an increment of 20%. |
|
INCOME TAXES |
|
The effective tax rate on income from operations was 36.6% in 2002, 38.5% in 2001 and 37.3% in 2000. The lower effective tax in 2002 was primarily a result of the reduction of the general effective tax rate to 38.0% and the impact of a $1 million contribution which generated a $1 million state income tax credit. It is estimated that the effective tax rate on an ongoing basis will be 38.0%. |
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – |
SEGMENT INFORMATION |
|
As discussed in note 16 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements, we operate in four business segments: the Retail, National Programs, Services and Brokerage Divisions. |
|
The Retail Division is our insurance agency business that provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, governmental, professional and individual customers. More than 97% of the Retail Division's revenues are commission-based. As a majority of our operating expenses do not change as premiums fluctuate, we believe that a majority of any fluctuation in commissions received by us will be reflected in our pre-tax income. The Retail Division's revenues accounted for 75% to 78% of our total consolidated commissions and fees over the last three years. The Retail Division's total revenues in 2002 increased $60.9 million to $348.5 million, a 21.2% increase over 2001. Of this increase, approximately $38.0 million related to commissions and fees from acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting that had no comparable revenues in 2001. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth and rising premium rates during 2002. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2002 increased $26.9 million to $78.9 million, a 51.8% increase over 2001. This increase is due to acquired revenues, increases in premium rates and improved cost structure related to these entities acquired during 2001 under the pooling-of-interest method of accounting. Total revenues in 2001 increased $88.0 million to $287.6 million, a 44.1% increase over 2000. This increase is primarily due to net new business growth and rising premium rates during 2001. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2001 increased $21.9 million to $52.0 million, a 72.7% increase over 2000. This increase is due to acquired revenues, net new business growth, and rising premium rates. |
|
The National Programs Division is comprised of two units: Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents; and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups and market niches. Similar to the Retail Division, essentially all of the National Programs Division's revenues are commission-based. Total revenues in 2002 increased $14.8 million to $58.6 million, a 33.7% increase over 2001, of which $7.9 million was related to net new business growth. The remaining increase in total revenues of $6.9 million was from acquired agencies, of which $3.3 million related to only two months of revenues from CalSurance Associates acquired as of November 1, 2002, whose revenues are primarily program related. In 2002, the underwriting company on our professional medical program decided not to renew their contract effective March, 2003, and therefore we are actively seeking a replacement carrier. Revenues from this professional medical program in 2002 were approximately $2.3 million, and without a replacement carrier, the 2003 revenues are expected to be less than $0.5 million. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2002 increased $8.4 million to $26.2 million, a 46.8% increase over 2001, of which the majority of the increase related to the internally generated revenues. Total revenues in 2001 increased $7.0 million to $43.8 million, an 18.9% increase over 2000, of which $2.4 million was related to net new business growth. All of this net new business growth was related to our Special Programs Division, but was partially offset by the loss of approximately $3.4 million of auto industry-related programs that were terminated. Revenues related to our Professional Programs Division were essentially flat for 2001; however, prior to 2001, we experienced at least three years of annual revenue declines of 10% to 20% in this business. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2001 increased $2.9 million to $17.9 million, a 19.6% increase over 2000, due primarily to net increases in revenues. |
|
The Services Division provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers' compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets, and managed healthcare services. Unlike our other segments, more than 90% of the Services Division's revenues are fees, which are not significantly affected by fluctuations in general insurance premiums. The Services Division's total revenues in 2002 increased $3.6 million to $28.6 million, a 14.5% increase over 2001. Of this increase, $2.8 million was the result of net new business growth and the remaining $0.8 million was acquired. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2002 increased $0.3 million to $4.3 million, an 8.7% increase over 2001, primarily due to strong net new business growth. The Services Division's total revenues in 2001 increased $3.3 million to $25.0 million, a 15.4% increase over 2000. Of this increase, $2.2 million was the result of net new business growth and the remaining portion was acquired. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2001 increased $0.9 million to $4.0 million, a 29.3% increase over 2000, primarily due to strong net new business growth. |
|
The Brokerage Division markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers. Similar to our Retail and National Programs Divisions, essentially all of the Brokerage Division's revenues are commission-based. Total Brokerage Division revenues in 2002 increased $12.1 million to $24.3 million, a 98.8% increase over 2001. Of this increase, $4.6 million related to commissions and fees from acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting that had no comparable revenue in 2001. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth. As a result of the Brokerage Division's strong net new business growth, income before income taxes and minority interest in 2002 increased $2.8 million to $6.9 million, a 67.9% increase over 2001. Total Brokerage Division revenues in 2001 increased $4.2 million to $12.2 million, a 53.1% increase over 2000, due entirely to net new business growth. Income before income taxes and minority interest in 2001 increased $1.4 million to $4.1 million, a 51.5% increase over 2000, again due to net new business growth. |
|
QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS |
|
The following table sets forth our quarterly results for 2002 and 2001. |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
FIRST |
SECOND |
THIRD |
FOURTH |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
$111,035 |
$114,903 |
$110,657 |
$119,147 |
Income before income taxes and |
|
|
|
|
minority interest |
33,711 |
35,690 |
33,396 |
31,867 |
Net income |
20,162 |
21,401 |
20,178 |
21,381 |
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ 0.31 |
$ 0.31 |
$ 0.30 |
$ 0.31 |
Diluted |
0.31 |
0.31 |
0.29 |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
$ 89,410 |
$89,933 |
$ 89,809 |
$95,877 |
Income Before Income Taxes and |
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
21,753 |
21,229 |
21,623 |
25,873 |
Net Income |
12,876 |
12,420 |
13,402 |
15,215 |
Net Income Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ 0.21 |
$ 0.20 |
$ 0.21 |
$ 0.24 |
Diluted |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.21 |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
|
Our cash and cash equivalents of $91.2 million at December 31, 2002 reflects an increase of $75.2 million from our December 31, 2001 balance of $16.0 million. During 2002, $93.3 million of cash was provided from operating activities and $149.4 million was raised from selling 5,000,000 shares of additional common stock in a follow-on stock offering in March 2002. From those funds, $120.9 million was used for acquisitions, $23.7 million was used to repay long-term debt, $13.4 million was used to pay dividends and $7.3 million was used for additions to fixed assets. |
|
Our cash and cash equivalents of $16.0 million at December 31, 2001 reflects a decrease of $21.0 million from our December 31, 2000 balance of $37.0 million. During 2001, $69.9 million of cash was provided from operating activities and $90.1 million was received from long-term debt financing. From this borrowing and existing cash balances, $131.0 million was used for acquisitions, $33.3 million was used to repay long-term debt, $9.7 million was used to pay dividends and $11.0 million was used for additions to fixed assets. |
|
Our cash and cash equivalents of $37.0 million at December 31, 2000 reflects an increase of $2.3 million from the December 31, 1999 balance of $34.7 million. During 2000, $42.3 million of cash was provided from operating activities and $0.5 million was received from long-term debt financing. From this financing and existing cash balances, $17.7 million was used for acquisitions, $5.5 million was used for purchases of our stock, $4.5 million was used to repay long-term debt, $7.5 million was used to pay dividends and $5.6 million was used for additions to fixed assets. |
|
Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities (the "current ratio") was 1.12 and 0.78 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in the current ratio in 2002 is primarily attributable to the follow-on stock offering of 5,000,000 shares of common stock which yielded net proceeds of $149.4 million. |
|
As of December 31, 2002, our contractual cash obligations were as follows: |
|
|
(in thousands) |
TOTAL |
LESS THAN |
1-3 YEARS |
|
AFTER 5 |
Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
$ 84,853 |
$27,279 |
$30,607 |
$26,455 |
$512 |
Capital Lease Obligations |
66 |
55 |
11 |
- |
- |
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
5,604 |
2,181 |
870 |
1,230 |
1,323 |
Operating Leases |
49,774 |
15,052 |
20,699 |
9,032 |
4,991 |
Maximum Future Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency Payments |
35,957 |
23,321 |
12,636 |
- |
- |
Total Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Obligations |
$176,254 |
$67,888 |
$64,823 |
$36,717 |
$6,826 |
In January 2001, we entered into a $90 million seven-year term loan agreement with SunTrust Banks, Inc. Borrowings under this facility bear interest based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day London InterBank Offering Rate ("LIBOR") plus a credit risk spread ranging from 0.50% to 1.00%, depending upon our quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Ninety-day LIBOR was 1.38% as of December 31, 2002. The loan was fully funded on January 3, 2001 and a balance of $64.3 million remained outstanding as of December 31, 2002. This loan is to be repaid in equal quarterly principal installments of $3.2 million through December 2007. Effective January 2, 2002, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with SunTrust Banks, Inc. to lock in an effective fixed interest rate of 4.53% for the remaining six years of the term loan, excluding our credit risk spread of between 0.50% and 1.00%. |
|
We also had a revolving credit facility with a national banking institution that provided for available borrowings of up to $50 million, with a maturity date of October 2002, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day LIBOR plus 0.45% to 1.00%, depending upon our quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. A commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.25% per annum was assessed on the unused balance. The 90-day LIBOR was 1.88% as of December 31, 2001. There were no borrowings against this facility at December 31, 2001 and the facility was not renewed upon its maturity date in October 2002. |
|
We continue to maintain our credit agreement with Continental Casualty Company (CNA) under which $1.0 million (the maximum amount available for borrowing) was outstanding at December 31, 2002. The interest rate on this credit agreement is equal to the prime rate (4.25% at December 31, 2002), plus 1%. The available amount will be paid in full August 2003. |
|
Both of our credit agreements require us to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain other covenants. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2002. |
|
Neither Brown & Brown nor its subsidiaries have ever incurred off-balance sheet obligations through the use of, or investment in, off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments or structured finance or special purpose entities organized as corporations, partnerships or limited liability companies or trusts. |
|
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investment portfolio and funds generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our normal liquidity needs through at least the end of 2003. Additionally, we believe that funds generated from future operations will be sufficient to satisfy our normal liquidity needs, including the required annual principal payments on our long-term debt. |
|
In December 2001, a universal "shelf" registration statement that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the public offering and sale, from time to time, of up to an aggregate of $250 million of debt and/or equity securities, was declared effective. The net proceeds from the sale of securities registered under the shelf registration statement would be used to fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures, and to meet working capital needs. The common stock follow-on offering of 5,000,000 shares in March 2002 was made pursuant to the shelf registration statement. |
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We continually evaluate our estimates, which are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. |
|
We believe that, of our significant accounting policies (see "Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies" of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002), the following critical accounting policies may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. |
|
REVENUE RECOGNITION |
|
Commission revenue is recognized as of the effective date of the insurance policy or the date the customer is billed, whichever is later. At that date, the earnings process has been completed, and we can reliably estimate the impact of policy cancellations for refunds and establish reserves accordingly. Management determines the policy cancellation reserve based upon historical cancellation experience adjusted by known circumstances. Subsequent commission adjustments are recognized upon notification from the insurance companies. Contingent commissions from insurance companies are recognized when determinable, which is when such commissions are received. Fee revenues are recognized as the services are rendered. |
|
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATIONS |
|
We have significant intangible assets acquired through business acquisitions consisting of purchased customer accounts, noncompete agreements, and the excess of costs over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (goodwill). The determination of estimated useful lives and the allocation of the purchase price to the intangible assets requires significant judgment and affects the amount of future amortization and possible impairment charges. |
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," all of our business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 have been accounted for using the purchase method. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company records the estimated value of the net tangible assets purchased and the value of the identifiable intangible assets purchased, which typically consist of purchased customer accounts and noncompete agreements. Purchased customer accounts includes the physical records and files obtained from acquired businesses that contain information on insurance policies, customers and other information that is essential to policy renewals, and primarily represents the present value of the underlying cash flows expected to be received over the estimated future renewal periods of those purchased customer policies. The valuation of purchased customer accounts involves significant estimates and assumptions such as cancellation frequency, expenses and discount rates. If any of these assumptions change, it could affect the carrying value of purchased customer accounts. Noncompete agreements are valued based on the terms of the agreements. Purchased customer accounts and noncompete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives and contract periods, which range from five to 20 years. The excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets is assigned to goodwill and is not amortized in accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,"(SFAS No. 142). |
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS IMPAIRMENT |
|
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires that goodwill be subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Other intangible assets will be amortized over their useful lives and will be subject to a lower of cost or market impairment testing. |
|
SFAS No. 142 requires us to compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value to determine if there is potential impairment of goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair value is estimated based on multiples of revenues, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and discounted cash flows. |
|
Management assesses the recoverability of our goodwill, identifiable intangibles and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The following factors, if present, may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iii) significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and (iv) market capitalization relative to net book value. If the recoverability of these assets is unlikely because of the existence of one or more of the above-mentioned factors, an impairment analysis is performed using a projected discount cash flow method. Management must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of these respective assets. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge. We completed our most recent evaluation of impairment for goodwill as of November 30, 2002 and identified no impairment as a result of the evaluation. |
|
RESERVES FOR LITIGATION |
|
We are subject to numerous litigation claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss is estimable, an accrual for the costs to resolve these claims is recorded in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets. Professional fees related to these claims are included in Other Operating Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. Management, with the assistance of outside counsel, determines whether it is probable that a liability has been incurred and estimates the amount of loss after analysis of each individual issue. New developments or changes in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters may significantly affect the required reserves and impact our net income. |
|
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS |
|
We entered into one derivative financial instrument, an interest rate exchange agreement, or "swap" to manage the exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our $90 million variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2002, we maintained this swap agreement whereby Brown & Brown pays a fixed rate on the notional amount to a bank and the bank pays us a variable rate on the notional amount equal to a base LIBOR rate. We have assessed this derivative as a highly effective cash flow hedge, and accordingly, changes in the fair market value of the swap are reflected in other comprehensive income. The fair market value of this instrument is determined by quotes obtained from the related counter parties in combination with a valuation model utilizing discounted cash flows. The valuation of these derivative instruments is a significant estimate that is largely affected by changes in interest rates. If interest rates significantly increase or decrease, the value of these instruments will significantly change resulting in an impact on our net income. |
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
|
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections," (SFAS No. 145). This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." This Statement also rescinds SFAS No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers." This Statement amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their applicability under changed conditions. This Statement will be effective for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for transactions entered into after May 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 145 will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," (SFAS No. 146). This Statement nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. This Statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure," (SFAS No. 148). This Statement amends SFAS No. 123 (same title) and provides an alternative method of transition for voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements in both annual and interim financial statements related to the methods of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results. This Statement also prohibits the use of the prospective method of transition, as outlined in SFAS No. 123, when beginning to expense stock options and change to the fair value-based method in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. As required, we adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 on December 31, 2002. |
|
In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45), which requires the guarantor to recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation at the inception of the guarantee. The adoption of FIN 45 will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which, clarified the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is applicable immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The provisions of FIN 46 are applicable for variable interest entities created prior to January 31, 2003 no later than July 1, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46 will not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF |
|||
INCOME |
|||
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
REVENUES |
|
|
|
Commissions and Fees |
$452,289 |
$359,697 |
$258,309 |
Investment Income |
2,945 |
3,686 |
4,887 |
Other Income, Net |
508 |
1,646 |
2,209 |
Total Revenues |
455,742 |
365,029 |
265,405 |
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
Employee Compensation and Benefits |
224,755 |
187,653 |
149,836 |
Non-Cash Stock Grant Compensation |
3,823 |
1,984 |
483 |
Other Operating Expenses |
66,554 |
56,815 |
44,372 |
Amortization |
14,042 |
15,860 |
9,226 |
Depreciation |
7,245 |
6,536 |
6,158 |
Interest |
4,659 |
5,703 |
1,266 |
Total Expenses |
321,078 |
274,551 |
211,341 |
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest |
134,664 |
90,478 |
54,064 |
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
49,271 |
34,834 |
20,146 |
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest, Net of Income Tax |
2,271 |
1,731 |
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
$83,122 |
$53,913 |
$32,793 |
|
======= |
====== |
======= |
Net Income Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$1.24 |
$0.86 |
$0.53 |
|
==== |
=== |
=== |
Diluted |
1.22 |
0.85 |
0.53 |
|
==== |
=== |
=== |
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
67,283 |
62,563 |
61,845 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Diluted |
68,043 |
63,222 |
62,091 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
See accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED |
BALANCE SHEETS |
|
At December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
ASSETS |
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$91,247 |
$16,048 |
Restricted Cash |
79,796 |
50,328 |
Short-Term Investments |
446 |
451 |
Premiums, Commission and Fees Receivable |
144,244 |
101,449 |
Other Current Assets |
16,527 |
8,230 |
Total Current Assets |
332,260 |
176,506 |
Fixed Assets, Net |
24,730 |
25,544 |
Goodwill, Net |
176,269 |
112,974 |
Other Intangible Assets, Net |
203,984 |
155,337 |
Investments |
8,585 |
8,983 |
Deferred Income Taxes, Net |
1,788 |
1,519 |
Other Assets |
6,733 |
7,874 |
Total Assets |
$754,349 |
$488,737 |
|
======= |
======= |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
Premiums Payable to Insurance Companies |
$191,682 |
$151,649 |
Premium Deposits and Credits Due Customers |
16,723 |
12,078 |
Accounts Payable |
15,393 |
10,085 |
Accrued Expenses |
46,586 |
31,930 |
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
27,334 |
20,855 |
Total Current Liabilities |
297,718 |
226,597 |
Long-Term Debt |
57,585 |
78,195 |
Other Liabilities |
5,604 |
6,308 |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
Minority Interest |
1,852 |
2,352 |
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.10 Per Share; |
|
|
Authorized 140,000 Shares; Issued and |
|
|
Outstanding, 68,178 at 2002 and 63,194 at 2001 |
6,818 |
6,319 |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
159,564 |
11,181 |
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
223,102 |
153,392 |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax |
|
|
Effect of $1,290 at 2002 and $2,750 at 2001 |
2,106 |
4,393 |
Total Shareholders' Equity |
391,590 |
175,285 |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
$754,349 |
$488,737 |
|
======= |
======== |
See accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF |
||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK |
ADDITIONAL |
|
OTHER |
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
SHARES |
PAR |
PAID-IN |
RETAINED |
COMPREHENSIVE |
|
|
OUTSTANDING |
VALUE |
CAPITAL |
EARNINGS |
INCOME |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2000 |
61,591 |
$6,159 |
$1,782 |
$87,492 |
$4,922 |
$100,355 |
Net income |
|
|
|
32,793 |
|
32,793 |
Net decrease in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation of available- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR SALE securities |
|
|
|
|
(2,427) |
(2,427) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
30,366 |
Common stock issued for employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock benefit plans |
947 |
95 |
2,134 |
|
|
2,229 |
Common stock purchased for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
employee stock benefit plans |
(365) |
(37) |
(3,916) |
(1,583) |
|
(5,536) |
Net distributions from pooled entities |
(9) |
(1) |
|
(1,869) |
|
(1,870) |
Principal payments made on ESOP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
obligations from pooled entities |
|
|
|
353 |
|
353 |
Cash dividends paid ($0.135 per share) |
|
|
|
(7,525) |
|
(7,525) |
Balance at December 31, 2000 |
62,164 |
6,216 |
-- |
109,661 |
2,495 |
118,372 |
Net income |
|
|
|
53,913 |
|
53,913 |
Net increase in unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
1,951 |
1,951 |
Net loss on cash-flow hedging derivative |
|
|
|
|
(53) |
(53) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
55,811 |
Common stock issued for employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock benefit plans |
786 |
79 |
4,749 |
|
|
4,828 |
Common stock issued for agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition |
244 |
24 |
6,432 |
|
|
6,456 |
Net distributions from pooled entities |
|
|
|
(849) |
|
(849) |
Adjustment to conform fiscal year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for pooled entity |
|
|
|
385 |
|
385 |
Cash dividends paid ($0.16 per share) |
|
|
|
(9,718) |
|
(9,718) |
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
63,194 |
6,319 |
11,181 |
153,392 |
4,393 |
175,285 |
Net income |
|
|
|
83,122 |
|
83,122 |
Net decrease in unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
(270) |
(270) |
Net loss on cash-flow hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
|
|
|
(2,017) |
(2,017) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
80,835 |
Proceeds from the issuance of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
common stock, net of expenses |
5,000 |
500 |
148,937 |
|
|
149,437 |
Common stock purchased for employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock benefit plans |
(400) |
(40) |
(10,102) |
|
|
(10,142) |
Common stock issued for employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock benefit plans |
380 |
38 |
9,430 |
|
|
9,468 |
Common stock issued to directors |
4 |
1 |
118 |
|
|
119 |
Cash dividends paid ($0.20 per share) |
|
|
|
(13,412) |
|
(13,412) |
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
68,178 |
$6,818 |
$159,564 |
$223,102 |
$2,106 |
$391,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF |
CASH FLOWS |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
Net income |
$83,122 |
$53,913 |
$32,793 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
|
|
|
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
Amortization |
14,042 |
15,860 |
9,226 |
Depreciation |
7,245 |
6,536 |
6,158 |
Non-cash stock grant compensation |
3,823 |
1,984 |
483 |
Deferred income taxes |
1,191 |
199 |
(2,721) |
Net losses (gains) on sales of investments, fixed |
|
|
|
assets and customer accounts |
1 |
(870) |
(712) |
Minority interest in earnings |
3,693 |
2,814 |
1,829 |
Adjustment to conform fiscal year-end for pooled entities |
-- |
385 |
-- |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect |
|
|
|
from insurance agency acquisitions and disposals: |
|
|
|
Restricted cash (increase) |
(29,468) |
(18,311) |
(12,051) |
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable (increase) |
(39,749) |
(2,611) |
(18,432) |
Other assets (increase) decrease |
(4,404) |
838 |
2,343 |
Premiums payable to insurance companies increase |
36,512 |
6,308 |
17,689 |
Premium deposits and credits due customers increase |
4,599 |
3,731 |
576 |
Accounts payable increase (decrease) |
526 |
2,279 |
(1,660) |
Accrued expenses increase |
13,318 |
4,306 |
7,316 |
Other liabilities (decrease) |
(1,140) |
(7,423) |
(570) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
93,311 |
69,938 |
42,267 |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
Additions to fixed assets |
(7,275) |
(11,017) |
(5,553) |
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired |
(120,926) |
(131,039) |
(17,651) |
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets and client accounts |
4,923 |
1,619 |
1,755 |
Purchases of investments |
(111) |
(3,006) |
(781) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
122 |
5,605 |
1,026 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(123,267) |
(137,838) |
(21,204) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
-- |
90,062 |
493 |
Payments on long-term debt |
(23,722) |
(33,297) |
(4,494) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of expenses |
149,437 |
-- |
-- |
Issuances of common stock for employee stock benefit plans |
5,765 |
2,844 |
1,746 |
Purchase of common stock for employee stock benefit plan |
(10,142) |
-- |
(5,536) |
Net distributions from pooled entities |
-- |
(849) |
(1,870) |
Cash dividends paid |
(13,412) |
(9,718) |
(7,525) |
Cash distribution to minority interest shareholders |
(2,771) |
(2,121) |
(1,597) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
105,155 |
46,921 |
(18,783) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
75,199 |
(20,979) |
2,280 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
16,048 |
37,027 |
34,747 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$91,247 |
$16,048 |
$37,027 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
NOTES |
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
|
Brown & Brown, Inc., a Florida corporation, and its subsidiaries ("Brown & Brown") is a diversified insurance agency and brokerage that markets and sells to its customers insurance products and services, primarily in the property and casualty area. Brown & Brown's business is divided into four segments: the Retail Division, which provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, governmental, professional and individual customers; the National Programs Division, which is comprised of two units – Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents, and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups and market niches; the Services Division, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers' compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets, and managed healthcare services; and the Brokerage Division, which markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers. |
|
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Any outside or third-party interests in Brown & Brown's net income and net assets is reflected as minority interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. |
|
As more fully described in Note 3 – Pooling-of-Interests Acquisitions, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for 2001 and all prior periods presented have been restated to show the effect of the acquisitions accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting. |
|
REVENUE RECOGNITION |
|
Commission income is recognized as of the effective date of the insurance policy or the date the customer is billed, whichever is later. At that date, the earnings process has been completed and Brown & Brown can reliably estimate the impact of policy cancellations for refunds and establish reserves accordingly. The reserve for policy cancellations is based upon historical cancellation experience adjusted by known circumstances. The policy cancellation reserve is periodically evaluated and adjusted as necessary. Subsequent commission adjustments are recognized upon notification from the insurance companies. Commission revenues are reported net of sub-broker commissions. Contingent commissions from insurance companies are recognized when determinable, which is when such commissions are received. Fee income is recognized as services are rendered. |
|
USE OF ESTIMATES |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
Cash and cash equivalents principally consist of demand deposits with financial institutions and highly liquid investments having maturities of three months or less when purchased. |
|
RESTRICTED CASH, AND PREMIUMS, COMMISSIONS AND FEES RECEIVABLE |
|
In its capacity as an insurance agent or broker, Brown & Brown typically collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting its authorized commissions, remits the premiums to the appropriate insurance companies. Accordingly, as reported in the consolidated balance sheets, "premiums" are receivable from insureds. Unremitted insurance premiums are held in a fiduciary capacity until disbursed by Brown & Brown. In certain states where Brown & Brown operates, the use and investment alternatives for these funds are regulated by various state agencies. Brown & Brown invests these unremitted funds only in cash, money market accounts and commercial paper and reports such amounts as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets. The interest income earned on these unremitted funds is reported as investment income in the consolidated statements of income. |
|
In other circumstances, the insurance companies collect the premiums directly from the insureds and remit the applicable commissions to Brown & Brown. Accordingly, as reported in the consolidated balance sheets, "commissions" are receivable from insurance companies. "Fees" are primarily receivable from customers of Brown & Brown's Services Division. |
|
INVESTMENTS |
|
Brown & Brown's marketable equity securities have been classified as "available-for-sale" and are reported at estimated fair value, with the accumulated other comprehensive income (unrealized gains and losses), net of tax, reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value below cost that are judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in investment income in the consolidated statements of income. |
|
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, Brown & Brown's marketable equity securities principally represented a long-term investment of 559,970 shares of common stock in Rock-Tenn Company. Brown & Brown's Chief Executive Officer serves on the board of directors of Rock-Tenn Company. Brown & Brown has no current intention of adding to or selling these shares. |
|
Non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit having maturities of more than three months when purchased are reported at cost and are adjusted for other-than-temporary market value declines. |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income reported in shareholders' equity was $2,106,000 at December 31, 2002 and $4,393,000 at December 31, 2001, net of deferred income taxes of $1,290,000 and $2,750,000, respectively. |
|
FIXED ASSETS |
|
Fixed assets are stated at cost. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized, and expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon sale or retirement, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is reflected in income. Depreciation has been determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the term of the related lease. |
|
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations" (SFAS No. 141), which requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method. SFAS No. 141 also includes guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets arising from such business combinations. |
|
Effective January 1, 2002, Brown & Brown adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," (SFAS No. 142), which provides for the non-amortization of goodwill. Goodwill will now be subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Other intangible assets will be amortized over their useful lives (other than indefinite life assets) and will be subject to a lower of cost or market impairment testing. SFAS No. 142 requires Brown & Brown to compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment of goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair value is estimated based on multiples of revenues, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and discounted cash flows. Brown & Brown completed its transitional impairment test of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 and its annual assessment as of November 30, 2002. No impairment was identified as a result of the tests. |
|
Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and consist of purchased customer accounts, noncompete agreements and the excess of costs over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (goodwill). Purchased customer accounts and noncompete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives and contract periods, which range from five to 20 years. Purchased customer accounts are records and files obtained from acquired businesses that contain information about insurance policies and the related insured parties that is essential to policy renewals. |
|
The carrying value of intangibles attributable to each division comprising Brown & Brown is periodically reviewed by management to determine if the facts and circumstances suggest that they may be impaired. In the insurance agency and brokerage industry, it is common for agencies or customer accounts to be acquired at a price determined as a multiple of their corresponding revenues or operating profits. Accordingly, Brown & Brown assesses the carrying value of its intangibles by comparison of a reasonable multiple applied to corresponding revenues or operating profits, as well as considering the undiscounted cash flows generated by the corresponding division. Any impairment identified through this assessment may require that the carrying value of related intangibles be adjusted; however, no impairments have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. |
|
DERIVATIVES |
|
Brown & Brown utilizes a derivative financial instrument to reduce interest rate risks. Brown & Brown does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," which was subsequently amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138. SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These standards require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of those instruments will be reported in earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The accounting for gains and losses associated with changes in the fair value of the derivative and the resulting effect on the consolidated financial statements will depend on the derivative's hedge designation and whether the hedge is highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the fair value of cash flows as compared to changes in the fair value of the liability being hedged. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVE PLANS |
|
Brown & Brown has elected to account for its stock-based compensation and incentive plans under the intrinsic value based method with pro forma disclosures of net earnings and earnings per share, as if the fair value based method of accounting defined in SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," had been applied. Under the intrinsic value based method, compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. In December 2002, Brown & Brown adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure." |
|
INCOME TAXES |
|
Brown & Brown files a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income taxes are provided for in the consolidated financial statements and relate principally to expenses charged to income for financial reporting purposes in one period and deducted for income tax purposes in other periods, unrealized appreciation of available-for-sale securities, and basis differences of intangible assets. |
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE |
|
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Basic net income per share excludes dilution. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted to common stock. |
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per common share and diluted net income per common and common equivalent share: |
|
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per common share and diluted net income per common and common equivalent share: |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$83,122 |
$53,913 |
$32,793 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
67,283 |
62,563 |
61,845 |
Dilutiveeffectof stock options using the treasury stock method |
760 |
659 |
246 |
Weighted average number of common and common |
|
|
|
equivalent shares outstanding |
68,043 |
63,222 |
62,091 |
|
===== |
===== |
===== |
Basic net income per share |
$1.24 |
$0.86 |
$0.53 |
Diluted net income per common and common equivalent share |
1.22 |
0.85 |
0.53 |
All share and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been restated to give effect to the two-for-one common stock split effected by Brown & Brown on November 21, 2001 and the two-for-one common stock split effected by Brown & Brown on August 23, 2000. Each stock split was effected as a stock dividend. |
|
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
|
The carrying amounts of Brown & Brown's financial assets and liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents, investments, premiums, commissions and fees receivable, premiums payable to insurance companies, premium deposits and credits due customers and accounts payable, at December 31, 2002 and 2001, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of Brown & Brown's long-term debt approximates fair value at December 31, 2002 and 2001 since the debt is at floating rates. Brown & Brown's one interest rate swap agreement is reported at its fair value as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. |
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
|
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements". This Statement also rescinds SFAS No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers." Additionally, this Statement amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meaning, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. This Statement will be effective for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for transactions entered into after May 15, 2002. It does not appear that this Statement will have a material effect on the financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company. |
|
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. " This Statement nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. This Statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. It does not appear that this Statement will have a material effect on the financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company. |
|
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure." This Statement amends SFAS No. 123 (same title) and provides alternative methods of transition for voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements in both annual and interim financial statements related to the methods of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results. The Statement also prohibits the use of the prospective method of transition, as outlined in SFAS No. 123, when beginning to expense stock options and change to the fair value based method in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. As required, Brown & Brown adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 on December 31, 2002. |
|
In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45), which requires a guarantor to recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation at the inception of the guarantee. It does not appear that this Statement will have a material effect on the financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company. |
|
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which clarified the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is applicable immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The provisions of FIN 46 are applicable for variable interest entities created prior to January 31, 2003 no later than July 1, 2003. It does not appear that this Statement will have a material effect on the financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company. |
|
NOTE 2 - PURCHASE ACQUISITION |
|
ACQUISITIONS IN 2002 |
|
On November 1, 2002, Brown & Brown acquired the insurance-related assets and certain liabilities of Chartered Financial Services Corporation, CalSurance Associates, Inc., United Network of Insurance Services, Inc., Sterling Reinsurance Intermediaries, Inc. and Lancer Claims Services, Inc., collectively referred to as "CalSurance" or "CSA." CalSurance specialized in program insurance business as well as commercial retail business. As a result of the acquisition, Brown & Brown entered into several niche program insurance businesses and expanded its retail insurance presence in the State of California. The aggregate purchase price was $65,316,000, consisting of $57,616,000 of cash, issuance of $6,399,000 in notes payable and the assumption of $1,301,000 of liabilities. The results of CSA's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since November 1, 2002. |
|
In addition, Brown & Brown acquired the assets and certain liabilities of 21 general insurance agencies, several books of business (customer accounts) and the outstanding stock of six general insurance agencies. The aggregate purchase price was $65,761,000 including $59,277,000 of net cash payments, issuance of $1,692,000 in notes payable and the assumption of $4,792,000 of liabilities. The results of these operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the dates of each acquisition. |
|
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired as of the date of each acquisition. |
|
(in thousands) |
CSA |
Other |
Total |
Current assets |
$- |
$ 3,045 |
$ 3,045 |
Property, plant and equipment |
500 |
834 |
1,334 |
Purchased customer accounts |
32,383 |
29,205 |
61,588 |
Noncompeteagreements |
50 |
1,740 |
1,790 |
Goodwill |
32,383 |
29,371 |
61,754 |
Other assets |
- |
1,566 |
1,566 |
Total assets acquired |
65,316 |
65,761 |
131,077 |
Current liabilities |
- |
(3,521) |
(3,521) |
Long-term debt |
(178) |
(384) |
(562) |
Non-current liabilities |
(1,123) |
(887) |
(2,010) |
Total liabilities assumed |
(1,301) |
(4,792) |
(6,093) |
Net assets acquired |
$64,015 |
$60,969 |
$124,984 |
|
|
|
|
The weighted average useful lives for the above acquired intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts – 20 years and noncompete agreements – five years. |
|
Goodwill of $61,754,000 was assigned to the Retail, National Programs and Brokerage Divisions in the amounts of $29,149,000, $26,900,000 and $5,705,000, respectively. Of that total amount, $50,773,000 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. |
|
The results of operations for the acquisitions completed during 2002 have been combined with those of Brown & Brown since their respective acquisition dates. If the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of 2001, Brown & Brown's results of operations would be as shown in the following table, excluding any amortization of goodwill in 2001. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods. |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Total revenues |
$495,988 |
$426,048 |
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
141,835 |
100,766 |
Net income |
87,568 |
60,292 |
Net income per share: |
|
|
Basic |
$ 1.30 |
$ 0.96 |
Diluted |
1.29 |
0.95 |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
Basic |
67,283 |
62,563 |
Diluted |
68,043 |
63,222 |
Additional consideration paid to sellers or consideration returned to Brown & Brown by sellers as a result of purchase price adjustment provisions are recorded as adjustments to intangibles when the contingencies are settled. The net additional consideration paid by Brown & Brown as a result of these adjustments totaled $5,181,000, $2,342,000 and $1,220,000 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, of which $2,470,000, $605,000 and $0 were allocated to goodwill in 2002, 2001 and 2000 respectively. As of December 31, 2002, the maximum future contingency payments related to acquisitions totaled $35,957,000. |
|
ACQUISITIONS IN 2001 |
|
On January 1, 2001, Brown & Brown acquired the insurance-related assets and certain liabilities of The Riedman Corporation ("Riedman"). Riedman was a provider of a broad range of insurance products and services in 13 states. As a result of the acquisition, Brown & Brown acquired operations that generated $54,193,000 in commissions and fees in 2000 and established locations in 12 new states. The aggregate purchase price was $92,310,000, including $62,398,000 of cash, issuance of $10,546,000 in notes payable and the assumption of $19,366,000 of liabilities, which was primarily debt related to prior acquisitions by Riedman. The results of Riedman's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since January 1, 2001. |
|
On May 1, 2001, Brown & Brown acquired the insurance-related assets and certain liabilities of Parcel Insurance Plan, Inc. ("PIP"). PIP was a specialty insurance agency providing insurance coverage to commercial and private shippers for small packages and parcels with insured values of less than $25,000 each. As a result of the acquisition, Brown & Brown expanded into a new insurance brokerage niche. The aggregate purchase price was $23,012,000, including $22,869,000 of cash and the assumption of $143,000 of liabilities. The results of PIP's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since May 1, 2001. |
|
On October 1, 2001, Brown & Brown acquired the insurance-related assets of Henry S. Lehr, Inc. and Apollo Financial Corporation ("Lehr"). Lehr was a provider of a broad range of insurance products and services including targeted insurance products and services for social services organizations. As a result of the acquisition, Brown & Brown expanded its retail insurance presence in the northeastern United States. The aggregate purchase price was $11,600,000, consisting entirely of cash. The results of Lehr's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since October 1, 2001. |
|
In addition, Brown & Brown acquired the assets and certain liabilities of nine general insurance agencies, several books of business (customer accounts) and the outstanding stock of two general insurance agencies. The aggregate purchase price was $52,824,000, including $36,056,000 of net cash payments, the issuance of notes payable in the amount of $4,662,000, the issuance of 244,028 shares of Brown & Brown's common stock with an approximate fair market value as of the respective acquisition dates of $6,456,000 based on the average stock price for the 20 trading days ending three days prior to the respective closing dates and the assumption of $5,650,000 of liabilities. The results of these operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the dates of each acquisition. |
|
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the date of each acquisition and are based on preliminary purchase price allocations: |
(in thousands) |
RIEDMAN |
PIP |
LEHR |
OTHER |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
$-- |
$-- |
$-- |
$4,114 |
$4,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets |
2,899 |
546 |
174 |
633 |
4,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased customer Accounts |
43,265 |
10,077 |
5,513 |
23,451 |
82,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncompeteagreements |
2,800 |
2,300 |
400 |
1,871 |
7,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs |
81 |
12 |
-- |
76 |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
43,265 |
10,077 |
5,513 |
22,662 |
81,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
-- |
-- |
-- |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
92,310 |
23,012 |
11,600 |
52,824 |
179,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
(9,388) |
(143) |
-- |
(5,333) |
(14,864) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
(8,616) |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(8,616) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
(1,362) |
-- |
-- |
(317) |
(1,679) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
(19,366) |
(143) |
-- |
(5,650) |
(25,159) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets acquired |
$72,944 |
$22,869 |
$11,600 |
$47,174 |
$154,587 |
The weighted average useful lives for the above acquired intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts – 20 years and noncompete agreements – 5 years. |
|
Goodwill of $81,517,000 was assigned to the Retail and National Programs Divisions in the amounts of $71,440,000 and $10,077,000, respectively. Of that total amount, $75,741,000 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. |
|
The results of operations for the acquisitions completed during 2001 have been combined with those of Brown & Brown since their respective acquisition dates. If the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of 2000, Brown & Brown's results of operations would be as shown in the following table. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods. |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2001 |
2000 |
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Total revenues |
$387,805 |
$358,583 |
Income before income taxes and minority |
|
|
interest |
94,479 |
62,724 |
Net income |
56,374 |
37,449 |
Net income per share: |
|
|
Basic |
$ 0.90 |
$ 0.60 |
Diluted |
0.89 |
0.60 |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
Basic |
62,767 |
62,089 |
Diluted |
63,426 |
62,335 |
The results of operations for the Riedman acquisition were combined with those of Brown & Brown effective January 1, 2001. Riedman's unaudited revenues, income before income taxes and minority interest and net income included in the 2000 pro forma data summarized above approximate $54,193,000, $1,075,000 and $661,000, respectively. The impact of Riedman on the 2000 pro forma data on diluted net income per share approximates $0.01 per share. |
|
ACQUISITIONS IN 2000 |
|
In 2000, Brown & Brown acquired the assets of five general insurance agencies, several books of business (customer accounts) and the outstanding stock of two general insurance agencies. The aggregate purchase price was $19,669,000, including $19,058,000 of net cash payments and the issuance of notes payable in the amount of $611,000. Of that total amount, $12,000 was assigned to goodwill in the National Programs Division. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as a purchase, and substantially the entire cost was assigned to purchased customer accounts, noncompete agreements and goodwill. The results of these operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the dates of each acquisition. |
|
NOTE 3 – POOLING-OF-INTERESTS ACQUISITIONS |
|
In 2001, Brown & Brown acquired all of the outstanding stock of the following insurance agency or brokerage firms. These transactions have been accounted for under the pooling-of-interests method of accounting and, accordingly, Brown & Brown's consolidated financial statements and related notes have been restated for all periods prior to the dates of acquisition to include the results of operations, financial positions and cash flows of these companies. The following table reflects the effects of its 2001 acquisitions on the 2001 and 2000 individual and combined operating results of Brown & Brown: |
|
|
2001 |
2000 |
||||
|
|
_________________________ |
_____________________________ |
||||
(in thousands, except share and |
|
|
|
NET |
|
|
|
per share data) |
COMMON |
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
NET |
|
SHARES |
|
NET |
PER |
|
NET |
INCOME |
|
ISSUED |
REVENUE |
INCOME |
SHARE |
REVENUE |
INCOME |
PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brown & Brown, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously reported for 2000 |
|
$307,050 |
$50,941 |
$0.87 |
$209,706 |
$33,186 |
$0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Huval Companies |
654,758 |
7,981 |
458 |
|
7,784 |
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer & Associates, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and SAN of East Central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida, Inc. |
191,176 |
1,971 |
191 |
|
2,050 |
(67) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Young Agency, Inc. |
1,142,858 |
11,784 |
771 |
|
11,207 |
(606) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Layne & Associates, Ltd |
482,334 |
6,707 |
234 |
|
6,808 |
(1,098) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency of Insurance Professionals, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc., CompVantage Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency, LLC, and Agency of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indian Programs Insurance, LLC |
240,268 |
2,591 |
257 |
|
2,168 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finwall & Associates Insurance, Inc. |
167,466 |
1,685 |
102 |
|
1,701 |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Connelly Insurance Group, Inc. |
515,176 |
5,984 |
415 |
|
5,155 |
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Benefit Group, Inc. |
119,708 |
865 |
166 |
|
1,066 |
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logan Insurance Agency, Inc. and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile Insurance Agency of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia, Inc. |
16,736 |
488 |
68 |
|
459 |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Froehlich-Paulson-Moore, Inc. and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&J Buildings, LLC |
62,200 |
1,193 |
83 |
|
1,266 |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McKinnon & Mooney, Inc. |
42,018 |
671 |
(6) |
|
805 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. |
1,130,112 |
16,059 |
233 |
|
15,230 |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brown & Brown, as combined |
|
$365,029 |
$53,913 |
$0.85 |
$265,405 |
$32,793 |
$0.53 |
NOTE 4 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
Effective January 1, 2002, Brown & Brown adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 provides for the non-amortization of goodwill. Goodwill will now be subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. Other intangible assets will be amortized over their useful lives (other than indefinite life assets) and will be subject to a lower of cost or market impairment testing. Brown & Brown completed its transitional impairment test of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 and its annual assessment as of November 30, 2002. No impairment was identified as a result of the tests. |
|
Goodwill amortization expense in 2001 and 2000 was $4,203,000 and $1,251,000, respectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 eliminated the corresponding amount of goodwill amortization in 2002. The following table provides a reconciliation of reported net income for 2001 and 2000 to adjusted net income had SFAS No. 142 been applied as of January 1, 2000: |
|
For the year ended December 31, |
||
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
Net income – as reported |
$83,122 |
$53,913 |
$32,793 |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill amortization, net of tax |
- |
2,585 |
784 |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income |
$83,122 |
$56,498 |
$33,577 |
|
|
|
|
Net income per share – Basic: |
|
|
|
Net income – as reported |
$1.24 |
$0.86 |
$0.53 |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill amortization, net of tax |
- |
0.04 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income |
$1.24 |
$0.90 |
$0.54 |
|
|
|
|
Net income per share – Diluted: |
|
|
|
Net income – as reported |
$1.22 |
$0.85 |
$0.53 |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill amortization, net of tax |
- |
0.04 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income |
$1.22 |
$0.89 |
$0.54 |
|
The changes in goodwill, net of accumulated amortization, for the years ended December 31, are as follows: |
|
|
|
National |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2001 |
$ 33,194 |
$ 1,661 |
$- |
$200 |
$ 35,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill of acquired businesses |
71,042 |
11,028 |
52 |
0 |
82,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense |
(3,769) |
(413) |
(1) |
(20) |
(4,203) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2001 |
100,467 |
12,276 |
51 |
180 |
112,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill of acquired businesses |
31,618 |
26,900 |
5 |
5,705 |
64,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill disposed of relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
sales of businesses |
(662) |
(271) |
- |
- |
(933) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2002 |
$131,423 |
$38,905 |
$56 |
$ 5,885 |
$176,269 |
|
======= |
====== |
==== |
====== |
======= |
Other intangible assets at December 31 consisted of the following: |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||||
|
_____________________________________ |
|
______________________________________ |
||||||
(in thousands) |
Gross |
Accumulated |
Net |
Weighted |
|
Gross |
Accumulated |
Net |
Weighted |
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounts |
$254,413 |
$(63,188) |
191,225 |
18.1 |
|
$193,412 |
$(52,172) |
141,240 |
17.4 |
Noncompete |
31,686 |
(18,927) |
12,759 |
7.7 |
|
29,970 |
(15,873) |
14,097 |
7.9 |
|
$286,099 |
$(82,115) |
$203,984 |
|
|
$223,382 |
$(68,045) |
$155,337 |
|
Amortization expense recorded for other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $14,042,000, $11,657,000 and $7,975,000, respectively. |
|
Amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 is estimated to be $15,827,000, $15,521,000, $15,153,000, $13,817,000, and $13,297,000, respectively. |
|
NOTE 5 – INVESTMENTRS |
|
Investments at December 31 consisted of the following: |
|
2002 |
2001 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
CURRENT |
NON-CURRENT |
CURRENT |
NON-CURRENT |
Available-for-sale marketable |
|
|
|
|
equity securities |
$148 |
$7,548 |
$96 |
$8,064 |
Non-marketable equity securities |
|
|
|
|
and certificates of deposit |
298 |
1,037 |
355 |
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
$446 |
$8,585 |
$451 |
$8,983 |
The following table summarizes available-for-sale securities at December 31: |
(in thousands) |
COST |
GROSS |
GROSS |
ESTIMATED |
Marketable Equity Securities: |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
$548 |
$7,161 |
$(13) |
$7,696 |
2001 |
534 |
7,637 |
(11) |
8,160 |
The following table summarizes the proceeds and realized gains/(losses) on investments for the year ended December 31: |
(in thousands) |
PROCEEDS |
GROSS |
GROSS |
2002 |
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable equity securities |
$32 |
$6 |
$(7) |
Non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit |
90 |
50 |
(1) |
Total |
$122 |
$56 |
$(8) |
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable equity securities |
$1,607 |
$-- |
$-- |
Non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit |
3,998 |
289 |
-- |
Total |
$5,605 |
$289 |
$-- |
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable equity securities |
$474 |
$144 |
$(15) |
Non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit |
552 |
70 |
(19) |
Total |
$1,026 |
$214 |
$(34) |
NOTE 6 - FIXED ASSETS |
|
Fixed assets at December 31 consisted of the following: |
|
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
$58,164 |
$56,759 |
Land, buildings and improvements |
1,965 |
3,324 |
Leasehold improvements |
3,777 |
3,662 |
|
63,906 |
63,745 |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(39,176) |
(38,201) |
|
$24,730 |
$25,544 |
Depreciation expense amounted to $7,245,000 in 2002, $6,536,000 in 2001 and $6,158,000 in 2000. |
|
NOTE 7 - ACCRUED EXPENSES |
|
Accrued expenses at December 31 consisted of the following: |
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
|
|
|
Accrued bonuses |
$19,469 |
$13,230 |
Accrued compensation and benefits |
11,001 |
8,818 |
Other |
16,116 |
9,882 |
Total |
$46,586 |
$31,930 |
NOTE 8 - LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following: |
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
Term loan agreements |
$65,286 |
$79,143 |
Revolving credit facility |
-- |
-- |
Acquisition notes payable |
19,253 |
18,493 |
Other notes payable |
380 |
1,414 |
|
84,919 |
99,050 |
Less current portion |
(27,334) |
(20,855) |
Long-term debt |
$57,585 |
$78,195 |
In January 2001, Brown & Brown entered into a $90 million unsecured seven-year term loan agreement with a national banking institution, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.50% to 1.00%, depending upon Brown & Brown's quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The 90-day LIBOR was 1.38% and 1.88% as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The loan was fully funded on January 3, 2001 and as of December 31, 2002 had an outstanding balance of $64.3 million. This loan is to be repaid in equal quarterly installments of $3.2 million through December 2007. |
|
To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the remaining six years of its seven-year $90 million term loan, Brown & Brown entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating rate LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest rate payments at 4.53%. This agreement did not impact or change the required 0.50% to 1.00% credit risk spread portion of the term loan. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended, Brown & Brown recorded a liability as of December 31, 2002 for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $2,070,000, net of taxes of approximately $1,269,000, with the related change in fair value reflected as other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2001, Brown & Brown recorded a liability for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately of $53,000, net of taxes of approximately $33,000. Brown & Brown has designated and assessed the derivative as a highly effective cash flow hedge. |
|
In 1991, Brown & Brown entered into a long-term unsecured credit agreement with a major insurance company that provided for borrowings at an interest rate equal to the prime rate (4.25% and 4.75% at December 31, 2002 and 2001 respectively) plus 1.00%. At December 31, 2002, the maximum amount of $1.0 million currently available for borrowings was outstanding. In accordance with an August 1, 1998 amendment to the credit agreement, the outstanding balance will be repaid in August 2003. |
|
Both of these credit agreements require Brown & Brown to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain other covenants. Brown & Brown was in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2002. |
|
Acquisition notes payable represent debt incurred to former owners of certain agencies acquired by Brown & Brown. These notes, including future contingent payments, are payable in monthly and annual installments through February 2014, including interest in the range from 6.0% to 15.25%. |
|
Brown & Brown also had a revolving credit facility with a national banking institution that provided for available borrowings of up to $50 million, with a maturity date of October 2002, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day LIBOR plus 0.45% to 1.00%, depending upon Brown & Brown's quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. A commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.25% per annum was assessed on the unused balance. The 90-day LIBOR was 1.88% as of December 31, 2001. There were no borrowings against this facility at December 31, 2001 and the facility was not renewed upon its maturity date in October 2002. |
|
Interest paid in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $4,899,000, $5,324,000 and $1,364,000, respectively. |
|
At December 31, 2002,maturities of long-term debt were $27,334,000 in 2003, $16,401,000 in 2004, $14,218,000 in 2005, $13,303,000 in 2006, $13,152,000 in 2007 and $511,000 in 2008 and beyond. |
|
NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES |
|
At December 31, 2002, Brown & Brown had a net operating loss carryforward of $2,217,000 for income tax reporting purposes, portions of which expire in the years 2011 through 2021. This carryforward was derived from agencies acquired by Brown & Brown in 2001 and 1998. |
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts used for income tax reporting purposes. Significant components of Brown & Brown's deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31 are as follows: |
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
Fixed assets |
$1,558 |
$-- |
Net unrealized appreciation of available-for-sale securities |
1,290 |
2,750 |
Prepaid insurance and pension |
940 |
616 |
Intangible assets |
3,972 |
1,186 |
Total deferred tax liabilities |
7,760 |
4,552 |
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
Fixed assets |
-- |
57 |
Deferred compensation |
4,349 |
2,987 |
Accruals and reserves |
4,323 |
2,044 |
Net operating loss carryforwards |
842 |
731 |
Other |
69 |
290 |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
(35) |
(38) |
Total deferred tax assets |
9,548 |
6,071 |
Net deferred tax (asset)/liability |
$(1,788) |
$(1,519) |
Significant components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the year ended December 31 are as follows: |
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Current: |
|
|
|
Federal |
$45,594 |
$30,731 |
$19,642 |
State |
4,868 |
4,302 |
3,225 |
Total current provision |
50,462 |
35,033 |
22,867 |
Deferred: |
|
|
|
Federal |
(1,139) |
(179) |
(2,337) |
State |
(52) |
(20) |
(384) |
Total deferred (benefit) provision |
(1,191) |
(199) |
(2,721) |
Total tax provision |
$49,271 |
$34,834 |
$20,146 |
A reconciliation of the differences between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate for the year ended December 31 is as follows: |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Federal statutory tax rate |
35.0% |
35.0% |
35.0% |
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
State income tax credits |
(0.7) |
- |
- |
Interest exempt from taxation and dividend exclusion |
(0.4) |
(0.3) |
(0.4) |
Non-deductible goodwill amortization |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Other, net |
(0.6) |
0.4 |
(1.0) |
Effective tax rate |
36.6% |
38.5% |
37.3% |
Income taxes paid in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $47,652,000, $33,840,000, and $18,740,000, respectively. |
|
NOTE 10 - EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN |
|
Brown & Brown has an Employee Savings Plan (401(k)) under which substantially all employees with more than 30 days of service are eligible to participate. Under this plan, Brown & Brown makes matching contributions, subject to a maximum of 2.5% of each participant's salary. Further, Brown & Brown provides for a discretionary profit sharing contribution for all eligible employees. Brown & Brown's contributions to the plan totaled $5,731,000 in 2002, $4,357,000 in 2001 and $3,663,000 in 2000. |
|
NOTE 11 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVE PLANS |
|
STOCK PERFORMANCE PLAN |
|
Brown & Brown has adopted a stock performance plan, under which up to 3,600,000 shares of Brown & Brown's stock ("Performance Stock") may be granted to key employees contingent on the employees' future years of service with Brown & Brown and other criteria established by the Compensation Committee of Brown & Brown's Board of Directors. Shares must be vested before participants take full title to Performance Stock. Of the grants currently outstanding, specified portions will satisfy the first condition for vesting based on increases in the market value of Brown & Brown's common stock from the initial price specified by Brown & Brown. Dividends are paid on unvested shares of Performance Stock that have satisfied the first vesting condition, and participants may exercise voting privileges on such shares which are considered to be "awarded shares." Awarded shares are included as issued and outstanding common stock shares and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Awarded shares satisfy the second condition for vesting on the earlier of (i) 15 years of continuous employment with Brown & Brown from the date shares are granted to the participants; (ii) attainment of age 64; or (iii) death or disability of the participant. At December 31, 2002, 2,783,422 shares had been granted under the plan at initial stock prices ranging from $3.79 to $32.90. As of December 31, 2002, 2,602,996 shares had met the first condition for vesting and had been awarded; and 89,766 shares had satisfied both conditions for vesting and had been distributed to participants. |
|
The compensation element for Performance Stock is equal to the fair market value of the shares at the date the first vesting condition is satisfied and is expensed over the remainder of the vesting period. Compensation expense related to this Plan totaled $3,823,000 in 2002, $1,984,000 in 2001 and $483,000 in 2000. |
|
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN |
|
Brown & Brown has adopted an employee stock purchase plan ("the Stock Purchase Plan"), which allows for substantially all employees to subscribe to purchase shares of Brown & Brown's stock at 85% of the lesser of the market value of such shares at the beginning or end of each annual subscription period. Of the 3,000,000 shares authorized for issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2002, 584,665 shares remained available and reserved for future issuance. |
|
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN |
|
On April 21, 2000, Brown & Brown adopted a qualified incentive stock option plan (the "Incentive Stock Option Plan") that provides for the granting of stock options to certain key employees. The objective of this plan is to provide additional performance incentives to grow Brown & Brown's pre-tax earnings in excess of 15% annually. Brown & Brown is authorized to grant options for up to 2,400,000 common shares, of which 1,152,000 were granted on April 21, 2000 at the most recent trading day's closing market price of $9.67 per share. All of the outstanding options vest over a one-to-ten-year period, with a potential acceleration of the vesting period to three to six years based on achievement of certain performance goals. All of the options expire ten years after the grant date. As of December 31, 2002, 124,080 option shares were exercisable. During 2002, an additional 5,000 option shares were granted, 31,732 option shares were exercised, and 32,000 option shares were canceled. |
|
On October 31, 2001 an additional 5,000 option shares were granted at the most recent trading day's closing market price of $28.40. These option shares vest in 1,000-share increments through 2006, if certain performance goals are met. The option shares are expensed at the price differential of the closing market price at the date of vesting and the option price times the shares vesting. As of December 31, 2002, 1,000 of these option shares became vested and were exercisable, and thus a corresponding $4,000 was expensed. |
|
The weighted average fair value of the incentive stock options granted during 2000 estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was $4.73 per share. The fair value of these options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0.86%; expected volatility of 29.6%; risk-free interest rate of 6.3%; and an expected life of ten years. |
|
PRO FORMA EFFECT OF PLANS |
|
Brown & Brown applies the intrinsic value based method of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," to account for its stock plans. Accordingly, Brown & Brown is adopting the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation" – Transition and Disclosure, effective for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002, which requires presentation of pro forma net income and earnings per share information under SFAS No. 123 (same title). |
|
Pursuant to the above disclosure requirement, the following table provides an expanded reconciliation for all periods presented that adds back to reported net income the recorded expense under APB 25, net of related income tax effects, deducts the total fair value expense under SFAS 123, net of related income tax effects and shows the reported and pro forma earnings per share amounts. |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Net income as reported |
$83,122 |
$53,913 |
$32,793 |
Total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
cost included in the determination of |
|
|
|
net income, net of related tax effects |
2,370 |
1,220 |
303 |
Total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
cost determined under fair value method for |
|
|
|
all awards, net of related tax effects |
(3,832) |
(3,751) |
(1,301) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
$81,660 |
$51,382 |
$31,795 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
Basic, as reported |
$1.24 |
$0.86 |
$0.53 |
Basic, pro forma |
1.21 |
0.82 |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted, as reported |
$1.22 |
$0.85 |
$0.53 |
Diluted, pro forma |
1.20 |
0.81 |
0.51 |
NOTE 12 - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
Brown & Brown's significant non-cash investing and financing activities for the year ended December 31 are as follows: |
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, |
|
|
|
net of tax benefit of $224 for 2002; net of tax effect of |
|
|
|
$1,188 for 2001, and net of tax benefit of $1,552 for 2000 |
$(270) |
$1,951 |
$(2,427) |
|
|
|
|
Net losses on cash flow-hedging derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
benefit of $1,236 for 2002 and net of tax benefit of $33 for 2001 |
(2,017) |
(53) |
-- |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable issued or assumed for purchased customer accounts |
9,883 |
34,767 |
611 |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable assumed by buyer on sale of customer accounts |
292 |
-- |
-- |
|
|
|
|
Notes received on the sale of fixed assets and customer accounts |
1,245 |
192 |
467 |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisitions accounted for under the |
|
|
|
purchase method of accounting |
-- |
6,456 |
-- |
NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
Brown & Brown leases facilities and certain items of office equipment under noncancelable operating lease arrangements expiring on various dates through 2015. The facility leases generally contain renewal options and escalation clauses based on increases in the lessors' operating expenses and other charges. Brown & Brown anticipates that most of these leases will be renewed or replaced upon expiration. At December 31, 2002, the aggregate future minimum lease payments under all noncancelable lease agreements in excess of one year were as follows: |
(in thousands) |
|
2003 |
$15,052 |
2004 |
12,015 |
2005 |
8,684 |
2006 |
5,656 |
2007 |
3,376 |
Thereafter |
4,991 |
Total minimum future lease payments |
$49,774 |
Rental expense in 2002, 2001 and 2000 for operating leases totaled $18,967,000, $16,829,000 and $13,081,000, respectively. |
|
Brown & Brown is not a party to any legal proceedings other than various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. Management of Brown & Brown does not believe that any such claims or lawsuits will have a material effect on Brown & Brown's financial condition or results of operations. |
|
NOTE 14 - FOLLOW-ON STOCK OFFERING |
|
In March 2002, Brown & Brown completed a follow-on stock offering of 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $31.50 per share. The net proceeds of the offering were $149,400,000 which are intended to be used for acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. |
|
NOTE 15 - BUSINESS CONCENTRATIONS |
|
Substantially all of Brown & Brown's premiums receivable from customers and premiums payable to insurance companies arise from policies sold on behalf of insurance companies. Brown & Brown, as agent and broker, typically collects premiums, retains its commission and remits the balance to the insurance companies. A significant portion of business written by Brown & Brown is for customers located in Arizona, California, Florida and New York. Accordingly, the occurrence of adverse economic conditions or an adverse regulatory climate in Arizona, California, Florida and/or New York could have a material adverse effect on Brown & Brown's business, although no such conditions have been encountered in the past. |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, approximately 3.4%, 5.2% and 6.5%, respectively, of Brown & Brown's total revenues were derived from insurance policies underwritten by one insurance company. Should this carrier seek to terminate its arrangement with Brown & Brown, Brown & Brown believes other insurance companies are available to underwrite the business, although some additional expense and loss of market share could possibly result. No other insurance company accounts for 5% or more of Brown & Brown's total revenues. |
|
NOTE 16 - SEGMENT INFORMATION |
|
Brown & Brown's business is divided into four segments: the Retail Division, which provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, professional and individual customers; the National Programs Division, which is comprised of two units – Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents, and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups and market niches; the Services Division, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers' compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets, and managed healthcare services; and the Brokerage Division, which markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers. Brown & Brown conducts all of its operations within the United States of America. |
|
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Brown & Brown evaluates the performance of its segments based upon revenues and income before income taxes and minority interest. Intersegment revenues are not significant. |
|
Summarized financial information concerning Brown & Brown's reportable segments is shown in the following table. The "Other" column includes corporate-related items and any income and expenses not allocated to reportable segments. |
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
||
(in thousands) |
RETAIL |
NATIONAL |
SERVICES |
BROKERAGE |
OTHER |
TOTAL |
Total revenues |
$348,457 |
$58,560 |
$28,578 |
$24,315 |
$(4,168) |
$455,742 |
Investment income |
4,961 |
1,078 |
422 |
213 |
(3,729) |
2,945 |
Interest expense |
16,777 |
2,188 |
269 |
634 |
(15,209) |
4,659 |
Depreciation |
5,159 |
932 |
502 |
268 |
384 |
7,245 |
Amortization |
11,063 |
2,533 |
38 |
252 |
156 |
14,042 |
Income before income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
taxes and minority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest |
78,939 |
26,220 |
4,315 |
6,864 |
18,326 |
134,664 |
Total assets |
527,015 |
201,038 |
12,573 |
66,910 |
(53,187) |
754,349 |
Capital expenditures |
5,799 |
472 |
251 |
337 |
416 |
7,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
RETAIL |
NATIONAL |
SERVICES |
BROKERAGE |
OTHER |
TOTAL |
Total revenues |
$287,555 |
$43,790 |
$24,968 |
$12,228 |
$(3,512) |
$365,029 |
Investment income |
4,383 |
1,718 |
365 |
113 |
(2,893) |
3,686 |
Interest expense |
13,345 |
1,108 |
277 |
-- |
(9,027) |
5,703 |
Depreciation |
4,627 |
879 |
508 |
178 |
344 |
6,536 |
Amortization |
13,366 |
2,334 |
24 |
54 |
82 |
15,860 |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and minority interest |
52,013 |
17,864 |
3,969 |
4,087 |
12,545 |
90,478 |
Total assets |
417,799 |
116,257 |
8,088 |
25,266 |
(78,673) |
488,737 |
Capital expenditures |
6,104 |
299 |
376 |
437 |
3,801 |
11,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
RETAIL |
NATIONAL |
SERVICES |
BROKERAGE |
OTHER |
TOTAL |
Total revenues |
$199,527 |
$36,838 |
$21,643 |
$7,985 |
$(588) |
$265,405 |
Investment income |
3,349 |
2,135 |
278 |
118 |
(993) |
4,887 |
Interest expense |
2,590 |
51 |
28 |
-- |
(1,403) |
1,266 |
Depreciation |
4,141 |
1,134 |
518 |
150 |
215 |
6,158 |
Amortization |
7,729 |
1,406 |
4 |
55 |
32 |
9,226 |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and minority interest |
30,114 |
14,937 |
3,070 |
2,697 |
3,246 |
54,064 |
Total assets |
236,787 |
96,477 |
6,277 |
15,087 |
(29,951) |
324,677 |
Capital expenditures |
3,682 |
489 |
867 |
266 |
249 |
5,553 |
NOTE 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
|
From January 1, 2003 through February 5, 2003, Brown & Brown acquired the assets of four general insurance agencies and the remaining 25% minority interest in Florida Intracoastal Underwriters. The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions was $33,139,000 including $33,059,000 of net cash payments, and the assumption of $80,000 of liabilities. |
|
Brown & Brown's consolidated statement of income does not include any results of these operations since the acquisitions were not effective until January 1, 2003. The following unaudited pro forma results of operations of Brown & Brown give effect to these acquisitions for the years ended December 31, as though the transaction had occurred on January 1, 2001 excluding any amortization of goodwill in 2001: |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Total revenues |
$471,519 |
$378,604 |
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
137,210 |
92,511 |
Net income |
86,972 |
56,894 |
Net income per share: |
|
|
Basic |
$1.29 |
$0.91 |
Diluted |
1.28 |
0.90 |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
Basic |
67,283 |
62,563 |
Diluted |
68,043 |
63,222 |
EXHIBIT 21 |
|
BROWN & BROWN, INC. |
|
ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES |
|
|
Florida Corporations: |
|
|
|
B & B Insurance Services, Inc. |
|
Champion Underwriters, Inc. |
|
Finwall & Associates Insurance, Inc. |
|
Madoline Corporation |
|
Physician Protector Plan Risk Purchasing Group, Inc. |
|
Program Management Services, Inc. |
|
Rankin & Rankin, Inc. |
|
Ross Insurance of Florida, Inc. |
|
Signature Insurance Group, Inc. |
|
Spencer & Associates, Inc. |
|
The Benefit Group, Inc. |
|
The Connelly Insurance Group, Inc. |
|
Underwriters Services, Inc. |
|
United Benefits, Inc. |
|
|
|
Foreign Corporations: |
|
|
|
A.G. General Agency, Inc. (TX) |
|
Acumen Re Management Corporation(DE) |
|
AFC Insurance, Inc. (PA) |
|
American & British Excess, Inc. (VA) |
|
Benesys, Inc. (LA) |
|
Brown & Brown Agency of Insurance Professionals, Inc. (OK) |
|
Brown & Brown Aircraft Acquisition Co. (DE) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance Agency of Virginia, Inc. (VA) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance Benefits, Inc. (TX) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance of Arizona, Inc. (AZ) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance of Georgia, Inc. (GA) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance of Nevada, Inc. (NV) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance Services of El Paso, Inc. (TX) |
|
Brown & Brown Premium Finance Company, Inc. (VA) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance Services of San Antonio, Inc.(TX) |
|
Brown & Brown Insurance Services of Texas, Inc. (TX) |
|
Brown & Brown Metro, Inc. (NJ) |
|
Brown & Brown of Arkansas, Inc. (AR) |
|
Brown & Brown of California, Inc. (CA) |
|
Brown & Brown of Central Oklahoma, Inc. (OK) |
|
Brown & Brown of Colorado, Inc. (CO) |
|
Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc. (CT) |
|
Brown & Brown of GF/EGF, Inc. (ND) |
|
Brown & Brown of Illinois, Inc. (IL) |
|
Brown & Brown of Iowa, Inc. (IA) |
|
Brown & Brown of Michigan, Inc. (MI) |
|
Brown & Brown of Minnesota, Inc. (MN) |
|
Brown & Brown of Mississippi, Inc. (MS) |
|
Brown & Brown of Missouri, Inc. (MO) |
|
Brown & Brown of New Jersey, Inc. (NJ) |
|
Brown & Brown of New York, Inc. (NY) |
|
Brown & Brown of North Dakota, Inc. (ND) |
|
Brown & Brown of Ohio, Inc. (OH) |
|
Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc. (SC) |
|
Brown & Brown of Tennessee, Inc. (TN) |
|
Brown & Brown of Washington, Inc. (WA) |
|
Brown & Brown of West Virginia, Inc. (WV) |
|
Brown & Brown of Wisconsin, Inc. (WI) |
|
Brown & Brown of Wyoming, Inc. (WY) |
|
Brown & Brown Re, Inc. (CT) |
|
Brown & Brown Realty Co. (DE) |
|
Graham-Rogers, Inc. (OK) |
|
Huffman & Associates, Inc. (GA) |
|
Huval Insurance Agency, Inc. (LA) |
|
John Manner Insurance Agency, Inc. (DE) |
|
Logan Insurance Agency, Inc. (VA) |
|
McKinnon & Mooney, Inc. (MI) |
|
Peachtree Special Risk Brokers of New York, LLC (NY) (Brown owns (100%) |
|
Peachtree Special Risk Brokers, LLC (GA) (Brown owns 75%) |
|
Poe & Brown of North Carolina, Inc. (NC) |
|
RAI of Mississippi, Inc. (MS) |
|
RAI of Oklahoma, Inc. (OK) |
|
RAI, Inc. (AR) |
|
Roswell Insurance & Surety Agency, Inc. (NM) |
|
Technical Risks, Inc. (TX) |
|
The Flagship Group, Ltd. (VA) |
|
The Young Agency, Inc. (NY) |
|
Unified Seniors Association, Inc. |
|
WMH, Inc. (GA) |
|
|
|
Indirect Subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
Automobile Insurance Agency of Virginia, Inc. (VA) |
|
Azure IV Acquisition Corporation (AZ) |
|
Azure VI Merger Co. (CA) |
|
Bass Administrators, Inc. (LA) |
|
Brown & Brown of Indiana, Inc. (IN) |
|
Brown & Brown of Lehigh Valley, Inc. (PA) |
|
Brown & Brown of New Mexico, Inc. (NM) |
|
Brown & Brown of Northern California, Inc. (CA) |
|
Ernest Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. (FL) |
|
Flagship Group Insurance Agency, Ltd. (MA) |
|
Flagship Management Co. (VA) |
|
Flagship Maritime Adjusters, Inc. (VA) |
|
Florida Intracoastal Underwriters, Limited Company (FL) |
|
Halcyon Underwriters, Inc. (FL) |
|
Hotel-Motel Insurance Group, Inc. (FL) |
|
MacDuff America, Inc. (FL) |
|
MacDuff Pinellas Underwriters, Inc. (FL) |
|
MacDuff Underwriters, Inc. (FL) |
|
M&J Buildings, LLC (ND) |
|
Richard-Flagship Services, Inc. (VA) (The Flagship Group, Ltd. owns 50%) |
EXHIBIT 23 |
|
|
|
[DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD] |
|
|
|
|
|
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT |
|
|
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-41204 on Form S-8, as amended by Amendment No.1 to Form S-8 No. 333-04888; No.’s 333-14925 and 333-43018 on Forms S-8; No.’s 333-58004, 333-58006, 333-58008, 333-70480 and 333-75158 on Forms S-3 for Brown & Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated February 6, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Brown & Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|
|
March 21, 2003 |
Exhibit 27.1 – Financial Data Schedule
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the consolidated financial statements of Florida Banks, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
EXHIBIT 24 |
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ BRADLEY CURREY, JR. |
Bradley Currey, Jr. |
|
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ J. HYATT BROWN |
J. HyattBrown |
|
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for her and in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as she might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ TONI JENNINGS |
Toni Jennings |
|
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ DAVID H. HUGHES |
David H.Hughes |
|
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ JAN E. SMITH |
Jan E.Smith |
|
|
Dated: March 19, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ THEODORE J. HOEPNER |
TheodoreJ. Hoepner |
|
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ SAMUEL P. BELL III |
Samuel P. Bell, III |
|
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ JIM W. HENDERSON |
JimW. Henderson |
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ JOHN R. RIEDMAN |
John R. Riedman |
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
|
The undersigned constitutes and appoints Laurel L. Grammig and Thomas M. Donegan, Jr., or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for Brown & Brown, Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. |
|
/S/ CORY T. WALKER |
Cory T. Walker |
|
Dated: January 22, 2003 |