SEC Filing | Brown & Brown, Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to ________________

Commission File Number 0-7201

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Florida	59-0864469
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

220 S. Ridgewood Ave., Daytona Beach, FL	32114
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (386) 252-9601

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $.10 par value, outstanding as of August 2, 2005 was 69,143,344.

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

INDEX

			PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	2

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004	3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	4

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	26

	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	27

SIGNATURE			28

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share data)

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
REVENUES
Commissions and fees	$	192,738	$	156,749	$	393,053	$	321,063
Investment income		1,524		333		2,489		1,021
Other income, net		1,669		860		2,763		1,423
Total revenues		195,931		157,942		398,305		323,507

EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits		94,100		76,270		184,484		152,552
Non-cash stock grant compensation		788		665		1,679		1,510
Other operating expenses		25,980		19,983		53,122		41,379
Amortization		8,357		5,483		15,892		10,300
Depreciation		2,527		2,269		4,894		4,423
Interest		3,711		743		7,253		1,454
Total expenses		135,463		105,413		267,324		211,618

Income before income taxes		60,468		52,529		130,981		111,889

Income taxes		23,435		20,376		50,930		43,388

NET INCOME	$	37,033	$	32,153	$	80,051	$	68,501

Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.54	$	0.47	$	1.16	$	1.00
Diluted	$	0.53	$	0.46	$	1.15	$	0.99

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		69,156		68,790		69,159		68,736
Diluted		69,738		69,370		69,724		69,283

Dividends declared per share	$	0.08	$	0.07	$	0.16	$	0.14

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share data)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	42,940	$	188,106
Restricted cash and investments		236,504		147,483
Short-term investments		2,831		3,163
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable		217,209		172,395
Other current assets		24,280		28,819
Total current assets		523,764		539,966

Fixed assets, net		38,489		33,438
Goodwill		523,610		360,843
Amortizable intangible assets, net		363,543		293,009
Investments		7,940		9,328
Other assets		10,090		12,933
Total assets	$	1,467,436	$	1,249,517

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Premiums payable to insurance companies	$	370,431	$	242,414
Premium deposits and credits due customers		24,002		32,273
Accounts payable		20,744		16,257
Accrued expenses		52,994		58,031
Current portion of long-term debt		49,699		16,135
Total current liabilities		517,870		365,110

Long-term debt		220,246		227,063

Deferred income taxes, net		25,555		24,859

Other liabilities		9,078		8,160

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 280,000
shares; issued and outstanding, 69,143 shares at 2005 and
69,159 at 2004		6,914		6,916
Additional paid-in capital		189,371		187,280
Retained earnings		494,649		425,662
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,753		4,467
Total shareholders’ equity		694,687		624,325

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,467,436	$	1,249,517

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	80,051		$	68,501
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization		15,892			10,300
Depreciation		4,894			4,423
Non-cash stock grant compensation		1,679			1,510
Deferred income taxes		925			1,121
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options		-			56
Net (gain) on sales of investments, fixed assets and customer accounts		(2,515	)		(1,747	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from insurance agency acquisitions and disposals:
Restricted cash and investments (increase)		(89,021	)		(16,651	)
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable (increase)		(44,814	)		(413	)
Other assets decrease		9,183			11,394
Premiums payable to insurance companies increase		128,046			16,291
Premium deposits and credits due customers (decrease) increase		(8,271	)		1,534
Accounts payable increase		4,441			7,859
Accrued expenses (decrease)		(5,219	)		(11,777	)
Other liabilities (decrease)		(988	)		(36	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		94,283			92,365

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to fixed assets		(7,210	)		(4,535	)
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired		(215,155	)		(143,555	)
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets and customer accounts		2,005			2,339
Purchases of investments		(190	)		-
Proceeds from sales of investments		521			738
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(220,029	)		(145,013	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings on revolving credit facility		50,000			50,000
Payments on revolving credit facility		(50,000	)		-
Payments on long-term debt		(8,766	)		(8,928	)
Issuances of common stock for employee stock benefit plans		410			662
Cash dividend paid		(11,064	)		(9,628	)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(19,420	)		32,106

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(145,166	)		(20,542	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		188,106			56,926

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	42,940		$	36,384

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1 - Basis of Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited, condensed, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“United States”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited, condensed, consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Share-Based Payment”, which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This revised statement, which requires that the cost of all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements, establishes fair value as the measurement objective and requires entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions. The revised statement applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after July 1, 2005. The Company will adopt revised SFAS No. 123 on its effective date, which is anticipated to be January 1, 2006.

Note 2 - Stock-Based Compensation and Incentive Plans

The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, to account for its stock-based compensation and incentive plans. Accordingly, the Company presents the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”, which requires presentation of pro forma net income and earnings per share information under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”.

Pursuant to the above disclosure requirements, the following table provides an expanded reconciliation for all periods presented that: (1) adds back to reported net income the recorded expense under APB No. 25, net of related income tax effects; (2) deducts the total fair value expense under SFAS No. 123, net of related income tax effects; and (3) shows the reported and pro forma earnings per share amounts (in thousands, except per share data):

	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Net income, as reported	$	37,033		$	32,153		$	80,051		$	68,501

Total stock-based employee compensation
cost included in the determination of
net income, net of related income tax effects		483			408			1,028			926

Total stock-based employee compensation
cost determined under fair value method
for all awards, net of related income tax effects		(1,139	)		(1,340	)		(2,337	)		(2,790	)

Net income, pro forma	$	36,377		$	31,221		$	78,742		$	66,637

Earnings per share:
Basic, as reported	$	0.54		$	0.47		$	1.16		$	1.00
Basic, pro forma	$	0.53		$	0.45		$	1.14		$	0.97

Diluted, as reported	$	0.53		$	0.46		$	1.15		$	0.99
Diluted, pro forma	$	0.52		$	0.45		$	1.13		$	0.96

Note 3 - Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per share and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per-share data):

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004

Net income	$	37,033	$	32,153	$	80,051	$	68,501

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding		69,156		68,790		69,159		68,736

Dilutive effect of stock options using the
treasury stock method		582		580		565		547

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding		69,738		69,370		69,724		69,283

Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.54	$	0.47	$	1.16	$	1.00
Diluted	$	0.53	$	0.46	$	1.15	$	0.99

Note 4 - Business Combinations

During the first two quarters of 2005, the Company acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of 23 general insurance agencies and several books of business (“customer accounts”). The aggregate purchase price was $235,939,000 including $198,073,000 of net cash payments, the issuance of $35,530,000 in notes payable and the assumption of $2,336,000 of liabilities. All of these acquisitions operate in the insurance intermediary business and were acquired primarily to expand the Company’s core businesses and to attract high-quality individuals to the Company. Acquisition purchase prices are typically based on a multiple of operating profit earned over a one- to three-year period after the acquisition effective date, within a minimum and maximum price range. The initial asset allocation of an acquisition is based on the minimum purchase price and any subsequent “earn-out” payment is allocated primarily to goodwill. All of these acquisitions have been accounted for as business combinations and are as follows (in thousands):

Name of Acquisitions	Business Segment		2005 Date of Acquisition		Net Cash Paid		Notes Payable		Recorded Purchase Price
American Specialty, Inc., et al.		National Programs		January 1	$	23,769	$	-	$	23,769
Braishfield Associates, Inc.		Brokerage		January 1		10,210		-		10,210
Hull & Company, Inc., et al.		Brokerage		March 1		140,026		35,000		175,026
Others		Various		Various		24,068		530		24,598
Total					$	198,073	$	35,530	$	233,603

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price to the fair values of the aggregate assets and liabilities acquired (in thousands):

	American Specialty			Braishfield		Hull		Others		Total
Other current assets	$	80		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	80
Fixed assets		370			25		2,500		103		2,998
Purchased customer accounts		7,409			4,320		66,343		8,450		86,522
Noncompete agreements		38			50		95		358		541
Goodwill		18,208			5,815		106,088		15,687		145,798
Total assets acquired		26,105			10,210		175,026		24,598		235,939

Other liabilities		(2,336	)		-		-		-		(2,336	)
Total liabilities assumed		(2,336	)		-		-		-		(2,336	)

Net assets acquired	$	23,769		$	10,210	$	175,026	$	24,598	$	233,603

The weighted average useful lives for the above acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15.0 years, and noncompete agreements, five years.

Goodwill of $145,798,000, all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes, was assigned to the Retail, National Programs and Brokerage Divisions in the amounts of $8,278,000, $18,708,000 and $118,812,000, respectively.

The results of operations for the acquisitions completed during the first two quarters of 2005 have been combined with those of the Company since their respective acquisition dates. If the acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, 2004, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table (in thousands, except per share data):

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004

Total revenues	$	196,170	$	184,762	$	410,003	$	375,212

Income before income taxes		60,544		61,303		134,995		128,819

Net income		37,080		37,524		82,504		78,865

Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.54	$	0.55	$	1.19	$	1.15
Diluted	$	0.53	$	0.54	$	1.18	$	1.14

These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.

Additional consideration paid to sellers or consideration returned to the Company by sellers as a result of purchase price “earn-out” provisions is recorded primarily as an adjustment to goodwill when the contingencies are settled. The net additional consideration paid by the Company in 2005 as a result of such adjustments totaled $17,065,000, of which $17,290,000 was allocated to goodwill and $225,000 was recorded as net liabilities. Of the $17,065,000 net additional consideration paid, $17,082,000 was paid in cash and $17,000 was recorded as forgiveness of a note payable obligation. As of June 30, 2005, the maximum future contingency payments related to acquisitions totaled $197,611,000, of which $113,103,000 could be earned within one year.

Note 5 - Goodwill and Amortizable Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for goodwill under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. SFAS No. 142 provides for the non-amortization of goodwill. Goodwill is now subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value-based test. Amortizable intangible assets (other than indefinite life assets) will be amortized over their useful lives and will be subject to a lower-of-cost-or-market impairment testing.

SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment of goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair value is estimated based on multiples of revenues, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and pre-tax income. The Company completed its most recent annual assessment as of November 30, 2004 and identified no impairment as a result of the evaluation.

The changes in goodwill, by business segment, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

				National
	Retail			Programs		Brokerage		Services		Total

Balance as of December 31, 2004	$	259,290		$	84,737	$	16,760	$	56	$	360,843

Goodwill of acquired businesses		18,385			25,897		118,806		-		163,088

Goodwill disposed of relating to sales
of businesses		(321	)		-		-		-		(321	)

Balance as of June 30, 2005	$	277,354		$	110,634	$	135,566	$	56	$	523,610

Amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2005									December 31, 2004
								Weighted									Weighted
	Gross					Net		Average		Gross					Net		Average
	Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying		Life		Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying		Life
	Value		Amortization			Value		(Yrs)		Value		Amortization			Value		(Yrs)
Purchased
Customer
Accounts	$	467,632	$	(110,618	)	$	357,014		14.9	$	381,744	$	(96,342	)	$	285,402		14.8

Noncompete
Agreements		33,534		(27,005	)		6,529		7.1		32,996		(25,389	)		7,607		7.1

Total	$	501,166	$	(137,623	)	$	363,543			$	414,740	$	(121,731	)	$	293,009

Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are estimated to be $32.6 million, $32.1 million, $31.6 million, $30.8 million, and $30.3 million, respectively.

Note 6 - Long-Term Debt

In July 2004, the Company completed a private placement of $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (the "Notes"). The $200.0 million is divided into two series: Series A, for $100.0 million, due in 2011 and bearing interest at 5.57% per year; and Series B, for $100.0 million, due in 2014 and bearing interest at 6.08% per year. The closing on the Series B Notes occurred on July 15, 2004. The closing on the Series A Notes occurred on September 15, 2004. The Company has used, and anticipates continuing to use, the proceeds from the Notes for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and repayment of existing debt. As of June 30, 2005, there was an outstanding balance of $200.0 million on the Notes.

In September 2003, the Company established an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a national banking institution that provided for available borrowings of up to $75.0 million, with a maturity date of October 2008, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.625% to 1.625%, depending upon the Company’s quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation. A commitment fee of 0.175% to 0.375% per annum is assessed on the unused balance. The 90-day LIBOR was 3.49% as of June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, there were no borrowings against the Revolving Credit Facility.

In January 2001, the Company entered into a $90.0 million unsecured seven-year term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with a national banking institution, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.00%, depending upon the Company’s quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation. The 90-day LIBOR was 3.49% as of June 30, 2005. The Term Loan was fully funded on January 3, 2001 and as of June 30, 2005 had an outstanding balance of $32.1 million. This Term Loan is to be repaid in equal quarterly installments of $3.2 million through December 2007.

To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the then remaining six years of the Term Loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest rate payments at 4.53%. This agreement did not affect the required 0.50% to 1.00% credit risk spread portion of the Term Loan. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, the Company recorded a liability as of June 30, 2005 for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $169,000, net of income taxes of approximately $108,000, with the related change in fair value reflected as other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a liability for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $455,000, net of income taxes of approximately $267,000. The Company has designated and assessed the derivative as a highly effective cash flow hedge.

All three of these credit agreements require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain other covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2005.

Acquisition and other notes payable as of June 30, 2005 were $37.8 million, which primarily represent debt incurred relative to former owners of certain agencies or customer accounts acquired by the Company. These notes are payable in monthly, quarterly or annual installments through July 2014, including interest ranging from 1.51% to 8.05%.

Note 7 - Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

In Item 3 of Part I of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as updated by Item I of Part II of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, certain information concerning certain legal proceedings and other matters was disclosed. Such information was current as of the respective dates of such filings. Additional relevant information is set forth below.

Policyholder Actions and Related Matters

As previously disclosed, the Company is a defendant in the putative class action lawsuits styled OptiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al., Stephen Lewis v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al., and Diane Preuss v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al., (together, the “Policyholder Actions”) all of which were transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation to the District of New Jersey to be coordinated in a single jurisdiction for pre-trial purposes.

As previously disclosed, governmental entities in a number of states are looking into issues related to the insurance industry’s compensation practices, and the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company (collectively, “Brown & Brown”) have received and responded to requests for information from some of them. No state agency has specifically charged or alleged any wrongdoing or violation of state law by Brown & Brown in connection with these inquiries.

As previously disclosed, a demand letter from counsel purporting to represent a current shareholder of the Company and seeking the commencement of a derivative suit by the Company against the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers and directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to Brown & Brown’s participation in contingent commission agreements (the “Demand Letter”) was received by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2004. The Special Review Committee (the “Committee”), comprised of independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors, was subsequently established to investigate and reach a determination concerning the merits of the proposed derivative action. The Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in this endeavor. In July 2005, the Committee communicated to the Company and to the attorney who sent the Demand Letter its determination that maintenance of the proposed derivative suit is not in the best interests of the Company. To date, no further communication has been received from the attorney who sent the Demand Letter.

As previously disclosed, “Brown & Brown” has contingent commission agreements with certain underwriters, including revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance underwriters based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with that underwriter, and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and overall volume of business placed with the underwriter. To a lesser extent, Brown & Brown has some override commission agreements, which allow for commissions to be paid by insurance underwriters in excess of the standard commission rate in specific lines of business, such as group health business. Brown & Brown has not chosen to discontinue receiving contingent commissions.

Brown & Brown cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of these matters or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material. The resolution of these matters may harm Brown & Brown’s business and/or lead to a decrease in or elimination of contingent commissions and override commissions, which could have a material adverse impact on Brown & Brown’s consolidated financial condition.

Other

Brown & Brown is involved in numerous pending or threatened proceedings by or against Brown & Brown that arise incident to the nature of its business. The damages that may be claimed in these various proceedings are substantial, including in many instances claims for punitive or extraordinary damages. Some of these claims and lawsuits have been resolved, others are in the process of being resolved, and others are still in the investigation or discovery phase. Brown & Brown will continue to respond appropriately to these claims and lawsuits, and to vigorously protect its interests.

Although the ultimate outcome of the matters referenced in this section titled “Other” cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on Brown & Brown or its subsidiaries, on the basis of present information, availability of insurance coverages and legal advice received, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such claims will not have a material adverse effect on Brown & Brown’s consolidated financial position. However, as (i) one or more of Brown & Brown’s insurance carriers could take the position that portions of these claims are not covered by Brown & Brown’s insurance, (ii) to the extent that payments are made to resolve claims and lawsuits, applicable insurance policy limits are eroded, and (iii) the claims and lawsuits relating to these matters are continuing to develop, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by unfavorable resolutions of these matters.

Note 8 - Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004
Cash paid during the period for (in thousands):

Interest	$	6,884	$	1,477

Income taxes	$	50,986	$	40,385

The Company’s significant non-cash investing and financing activities are as follows (in thousands):

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004

Net unrealized holding (loss) on available-for-sale securities,
net of income tax benefit of $388 in 2005 and $25 in 2004	$	(1,000	)	$	(157	)

Net gain on cash-flow hedging derivative, net of income tax
effect of $159 in 2005 and $404 in 2004		286			675

Notes payable issued or assumed for purchased customer accounts		35,530			1,868

Notes received on sale of fixed assets and customer accounts		1,842			4,638

Common stock issued for acquisitions accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting		-			6,244

Note 9 - Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income, net of related income tax effects, are as follows (in thousands):

	For the three months ended June 30,					For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004		2005			2004

Net income	$	37,033		$	32,153	$	80,051		$	68,501

Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on
available-for-sale securities		(216	)		858		(1,000	)		(157	)

Net (loss) gain on cash-flow hedging derivative		(14	)		742		286			675

Comprehensive income	$	36,803		$	33,753	$	79,337		$	69,019

Note 10 - Segment Information

The Company’s business is divided into four reportable segments: the Retail Division, which provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public entity, professional and individual customers; the National Programs Division, which is comprised of two units - Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals, delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents, and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, governmental entities and market niches; the Brokerage Division, which markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers; and the Services Division, which provides insurance-related services including third-party administration, consulting for the workers’ compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets, and managed healthcare services. The Company conducts all of its operations within the United States of America.

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are shown in the following table. The “Other” column includes any income and expenses not allocated to reportable segments and corporate-related items, including the inter-company interest expense charge to the reporting segment (in thousands).

	Retail		National Programs		Brokerage		Service		Other			Total
2005
Total revenues	$	257,958	$	63,510	$	59,250	$	13,838	$	3,749		$	398,305

Investment income		42		171		383		-		1,893			2,489
Amortization		9,539		3,996		2,306		22		29			15,892
Depreciation		2,819		968		540		220		347			4,894
Interest expense		10,598		5,183		5,355		2		(13,885	)		7,253
Income before income taxes		73,490		16,235		15,375		3,851		22,030			130,981

Total assets		903,721		407,058		452,372		15,061		(310,776	)		1,467,436
Capital expenditures		3,732		2,131		836		202		309			7,210

	Retail		National Programs		Brokerage		Service		Other			Total
2004
Total revenues	$	240,978	$	47,356	$	20,476	$	14,297	$	400		$	323,507

Investment income		535		41		-		-		445			1,021
Amortization		7,229		2,732		242		19		78			10,300
Depreciation		2,929		748		245		170		331			4,423
Interest expense		10,305		3,968		430		67		(13,316	)		1,454
Income before income taxes		67,772		12,683		7,243		3,439		20,752			111,889

Total assets		787,390		324,545		82,573		14,940		(215,349	)		994,099
Capital expenditures		3,071		671		223		396		203			4,564

ITEM 2:

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION UPDATES THE MD&A CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY’S 2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, AND THE TWO DISCUSSIONS SHOULD BE READ TOGETHER.

General

We are an insurance intermediary organization with origins dating from 1939 and are headquartered in Daytona Beach and Tampa, Florida. We market and sell to our customers insurance products and services, primarily in the property, casualty and the employee benefits markets. In our capacity as an agent and broker, we do not assume underwriting risks. Instead, we provide our customers with quality insurance contracts, as well as other targeted, customized risk management products and services.

We are compensated for our services primarily by commissions paid by insurance companies and fees paid by customers for certain services. The commission income that we receive is usually a percentage of the premium paid by the insured. Commission rates generally depend upon the type of insurance, the particular insurance company and the nature of the services provided by us. In some cases, a commission is shared with other agents or brokers who have acted jointly with us in a transaction. We may also receive “contingent commissions” which are revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance companies based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with such company, and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and overall volume of business that we place with such insurance companies during the prior year.

The Insurance Market

Premium rates are established by insurance companies based upon many factors, including reinsurance rates, none of which we control. Beginning in 1986 and continuing through 1999, commission revenues were adversely influenced by a consistent decline in premium rates resulting from intense competition among property and casualty companies for market share. Among other factors, this condition of a prevailing decline in premium rates, commonly referred to as a "soft market," generally resulted in flat to reduced commissions on renewal business. The effect of this softness in rates was somewhat offset by our substantial merger and acquisition activity and net new business production. As a result of increasing loss ratios (the comparison of incurred losses plus loss adjustment expenses against earned premium) of insurance companies through 1999, there was a general increase in premium rates commencing in the first quarter of 2000 and continuing into the first half of 2003. Starting in the second half of 2003, as insurance companies began to experience improved loss ratios, they again became more competitive on selected risks, resulting in a moderation of premium rate increases, and in some cases reductions in premium rates. We expect the softening of insurance premium rates throughout most of the United States will continue through 2005.

Critical Accounting Policies

The more critical accounting and reporting policies include our accounting for revenue recognition, business acquisitions and purchase price allocations, intangible assets impairments, reserves for litigation and derivative interests. In particular, the accounting for these areas requires significant judgments to be made by management. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. Refer to Note 1 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission for details regarding all of our critical and significant accounting policies.

Results of Operations

The condensed consolidated financial information relating to the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the three months ended June 30,							For the six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		% Change			2005		2004		% Change
REVENUES
Commissions and fees	$	188,736	$	153,227		23.2	%	$	361,207	$	291,765		23.8	%
Contingent commissions		4,002		3,522		13.6	%		31,846		29,298		8.7	%
Investment income		1,524		333		357.7	%		2,489		1,021		143.8	%
Other income, net		1,669		860		94.1	%		2,763		1,423		94.2	%
Total revenues		195,931		157,942		24.1	%		398,305		323,507		23.1	%

EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits		94,100		76,270		23.4	%		184,484		152,552		20.9	%
Non-cash stock grant compensation		788		665		18.5	%		1,679		1,510		11.2	%
Other operating expenses		25,980		19,983		30.0	%		53,122		41,379		28.4	%
Amortization		8,357		5,483		52.4	%		15,892		10,300		54.3	%
Depreciation		2,527		2,269		11.4	%		4,894		4,423		10.6	%
Interest		3,711		743		399.5	%		7,253		1,454		398.8	%
Total expenses		135,463		105,413		28.5	%		267,324		211,618		26.3	%

Income before income taxes		60,468		52,529		15.1	%		130,981		111,889		17.1	%

Income taxes		23,435		20,376		15.0	%		50,930		43,388		17.4	%

NET INCOME	$	37,033	$	32,153		15.2	%	$	80,051	$	68,501		16.9	%

Net Income. Net income for the second quarter of 2005 was $37.0 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, compared with net income in the second quarter of 2004 of $32.2 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, a 15.2% increase on a per-share basis. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $80.1 million or $1.15 per diluted share, compared with net income for the comparable period in 2004 of $68.5 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, a 16.2% increase on a per-share basis.

Commissions & Fees. Commissions and fees, including contingent commissions, for the second quarter of 2005 increased $36.0 million, or 23.0%, over the same period in 2004. Contingent commissions for the second quarter of 2005 increased $0.5 million over the second quarter of 2004, to $4.0 million. Core commissions and fees are our commissions and fees, less (i) contingent commissions and (ii) divested business (commissions and fees generated from offices, books of business or niches sold or terminated). Core commissions and fees revenue for the second quarter of 2005 increased $37.6 million, of which approximately $34.3 million represents core commissions and fees from agencies acquired since the second quarter of 2004. After divested business of $2.1 million, the remaining $3.3 million represents net new business production, which reflects a 2.2% internal growth rate for core commissions and fees. Commissions and fees for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $72.0 million, or 22.4%, over the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, contingent commissions increased $2.5 million over the comparable period in 2004. Core commissions and fees revenue for the first six months of 2005 increased $74.0 million, of which approximately $65.9 million of the total increase represents core commissions and fees from agencies acquired since the comparable period in 2004. After divested business of $4.6 million, the remaining $8.1 million represents net new business production, which reflects a 2.8% internal growth rate for core commissions and fees.

Contingent commissions in the insurance industry have recently come under scrutiny. Various governmental entities are reviewing such commission arrangements, and lawsuits seeking class action status have been filed against various insurance intermediaries and companies that relate in part to such commissions. Some of the largest brokers in the world have announced that they will no longer accept contingent commissions, and certain insurance companies have said that they are going to discontinue paying contingent commissions or are reviewing the issue. We have not chosen to discontinue receiving contingent commissions. An elimination or significant decrease in the payment of contingent commissions to us could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. See "Recent Industry Developments" below for additional information.

Investment Income. Investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.2 million, or 357.7%, over the same period in 2004. Investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.5 million, or 143.8%, over the same period in 2004. These increases in investment income were primarily due to higher available invested cash and an increase in interest rates.

Other Income, Net. Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.8 million, or 94.1%, over the same period in 2004. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.3 million, or 94.2%, over the same period in 2004. Other income consists primarily of gains and losses from the sale and disposition of assets. The majority of this gain for the second quarter of 2005 was the result of the completion of the one year earn-out from the sale of our medical services operation in Louisiana in June 2004.

Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits for the second quarter of 2005 increased $17.8 million, or 23.4%, over the same period in 2004. Employee compensation and benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $31.9 million, or 20.9%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily related to the addition of new employees from acquisitions completed since July 1, 2004 and increased compensation that resulted from higher commissions and fees revenue. Employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 48.0% for the second quarter of 2005, from 48.3% for the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 46.3%, from 47.2% for the same period in 2004. These improved ratios for the three and six month periods was the result of the continued assimilation of the acquisitions completed in 2004 and 2005 into our standard compensation program.

Non-Cash Stock Grant Compensation. Non-cash stock grant compensation expense represents the expense required to be recorded under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, relating to our Stock Performance Plan. The annual cost of this Stock Performance Plan increases only when granted shares become “awarded”, which occurs when our average stock price over a 20 trading-day period increases by increments of 20% or more over the price at the time of the original grant. Non-cash stock grant compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.1 million, or 18.5%, over the same period in 2004. Non-cash stock grant compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.2 million, or 11.2%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily the result of more shares being awarded and therefore becoming outstanding during 2005 than were outstanding during 2004.

Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses for the second quarter of 2005 increased $6.0 million, or 30.0%, over the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, other operating expenses increased $11.7 million, or 28.4%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily the result of acquisitions completed since the third quarter of 2004 that had no comparable results in the same period of 2004. Other operating expenses as a percentage of revenues for the second quarter of 2005 increased to 13.3%, compared with 12.7% for the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, other operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 13.3%, compared with 12.8% for the same period in 2004. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, there was a general increase in travel and entertainment expenses, and a significant increase in legal professional fees of approximately $1.0 million per quarter.

Amortization. Amortization expense for the second quarter of 2005 increased $2.9 million, or 52.4%, over the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, amortization expense increased $5.6 million, or 54.3%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily due to acquisitions completed since July 1, 2004, and the change in the amortization period for purchased customer accounts to 15 years from 20 years that was implemented in November 2004.

Depreciation. Depreciation expense for the second quarter of 2005 increased $0.3 million, or 11.4%, over the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, depreciation expense increased $0.5 million, or 10.6%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are due to capital expenditures and fixed assets purchased in acquisitions completed since July 1, 2004.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the second quarter of 2005 increased $3.0 million, or 399.5%, over the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, interest expense increased $5.8 million, or 398.8%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily the result of additional interest expense relating to the funding of the $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (as discussed in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) in July and September of 2004.

Segment Information

As discussed in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we operate in four reportable segments: the Retail, National Programs, Brokerage and Services Divisions. Our core commissions and fees internal growth rates for the three months ended June 30, 2005 by divisional segment are as follows:

	For the three months				Total			Total			Less		Internal
	ended June 30,				Net			Net			Acquisition		Net
	2005		2004		Change			Growth %			Revenues		Growth %

Florida Retail	$	40,989	$	35,928	$	5,061			14.1	%	$	1,827		9.0	%
National Retail		51,541		47,225		4,316			9.1	%		4,452		(0.3	)%
Western Retail		25,830		28,802		(2,972	)		(10.3	)%		113		(10.7	)%
Total Retail⁽¹⁾		118,360		111,955		6,405			5.7	%		6,392		0.0	%

Professional Programs		9,515		10,087		(572	)		(5.7	)%		-		(5.7	)%
Special Programs		20,335		14,659		5,676			38.7	%		3,768		13.0	%
Total National Programs		29,850		24,746		5,104			20.6	%		3,768		5.4	%

Brokerage		34,077		8,322		25,755			309.5	%		24,117		19.7	%

Services		6,449		6,086		363			6.0	%		-		6.0	%

Total Core Commissions and Fees	$	188,736	$	151,109	$	37,627			24.9	%	$	34,277		2.2	%

(1)	The Retail segment includes commissions and fees reported in the “Other” column of the Segment Information in Note 10 which includes corporate and consolidation items.

The reconciliation of the above internal growth schedule to the total Commissions and Fees included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

	For the three months ended June 30,
	2005		2004

Total core commissions and fees	$	188,736	$	151,109
Contingent commissions		4,002		3,522
Divested business		-		2,118

Total commission & fees	$	192,738	$	156,749

Our core commissions and fees internal growth rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 by divisional segment are as following:

	For the six months				Total			Total			Less		Internal
	ended June 30,				Net			Net			Acquisition		Net
	2005		2004		Change			Growth %			Revenues		Growth %

Florida Retail	$	78,193	$	69,802	$	8,391			12.0	%	$	2,874		7.9	%
National Retail		102,017		87,323		14,694			16.8	%		14,739		(0.1	)%
Western Retail		51,182		54,430		(3,248	)		(6.0	)%		970		(7.7	)%
Total Retail⁽¹⁾		231,392		211,555		19,837			9.4	%		18,583		0.6	%

Professional Programs		20,343		20,404		(61	)		(0.3	)%		715		(3.8	)%
Special Programs		41,195		26,440		14,755			55.8	%		11,088		13.9	%
Total National Programs		61,538		46,844		14,694			31.4	%		11,803		6.2	%

Brokerage		55,444		16,992		38,452			226.3	%		35,472		17.5	%

Services		12,833		11,823		1,010			8.5	%		-		8.5	%

Total Core Commissions and Fees	$	361,207	$	287,214	$	73,993			25.8	%	$	65,858		2.8	%

(1)	The Retail segment includes commissions and fees reported in the “Other” column of the Segment Information in Note 10 which includes the corporate and consolidation items.

The reconciliation of the above internal growth schedule to the total Commissions and Fees included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004

Total core commissions and fees	$	361,207	$	287,214
Contingent commissions		31,846		29,298
Divested business		-		4,551

Total commission & fees	$	393,053	$	321,063

Retail

The Retail Division provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public entity, professional and individual customers. Financial information relating to our Retail Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			% Change			2005			2004			% Change
REVENUES
Commissions and fees	$	117,610		$	112,907			4.2	%	$	229,825		$	214,532			7.1	%
Contingent commissions		2,440			3,172			(23.1	)%		26,802			25,422			5.4	%
Investment income		19			14			35.7	%		42			535			(92.1	)%
Other income (loss), net		568			(141	)		NMF			1,289			489			163.6	%
Total revenues		120,637			115,952			4.0	%		257,958			240,978			7.0	%

EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits		58,496			57,731			1.3	%		119,247			113,870			4.7	%
Non-cash stock grant compensation		552			400			38.0	%		1,099			800			37.4	%
Other operating expenses		20,101			19,281			4.3	%		41,166			38,073			8.1	%
Amortization		4,816			3,797			26.8	%		9,539			7,229			32.0	%
Depreciation		1,403			1,495			(6.2	)%		2,819			2,929			(3.8	)%
Interest		5,224			5,491			(4.9	)%		10,598			10,305			2.8	%
Total expenses		90,592			88,195			2.7	%		184,468			173,206			6.5	%

Income before income taxes	$	30,045		$	27,757			8.2	%	$	73,490		$	67,772			8.4	%

Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees		0.0	%		3.9	%					0.6	%		3.4	%

Employee compensation and benefits ratio		48.5	%		49.8	%					46.2	%		47.3	%

Other operating expenses ratio		16.7	%		16.6	%					16.0	%		15.8	%

Capital expenditures	$	1,557		$	1,279					$	3,732		$	3,071

Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004										$	903,721		$	787,390

The Retail Division’s total revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 4.0%, or $4.7 million, to $120.6 million. Contingent commissions for the quarter decreased $0.7 million over the second quarter of 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $6.4 million related to the core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. Commissions and fees recorded in the second quarter of 2004 from business divested during 2005 was $1.4 million. The Retail Division’s internal growth rate for core commissions and fees was nil for the second quarter of 2005, which was primarily due to the softening and compression of insurance premium rates in virtually all parts of the country. In some regions, such as Florida, this decline in rates is being slightly offset by an increase in business exposure units, created by an improving economy. Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 8.2%, or $2.3 million, to $30.0 million. This increase is primarily due to the earnings from acquisitions.

The Retail Division’s total revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 7.0%, or $17.0 million, to $258.0 million. Contingent commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2005, increased $1.4 million, over the same period in 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $18.6 million related to the core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. Commissions and fees recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2004 from business divested during 2005 was $3.2 million. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth in core commissions and fees. The Retail Division’s internal growth rate for core commissions and fees was 0.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 8.4%, or $5.7 million, to $73.5 million. This increase is primarily due to the earnings from acquisitions and net new business.

National Programs

The National Programs Division is comprised of two units: Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents; and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, public entities and market niches. Financial information relating to our National Programs Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			% Change			2005			2004			% Change
REVENUES
Commissions and fees	$	29,850		$	24,746			20.6	%	$	61,538		$	46,844			31.4	%
Contingent commissions		486			393			23.7	%		1,634			478			241.8	%
Investment income		96			19			405.3	%		171			41			317.1	%
Other income (loss), net		30			(2	)		NMF			167			(7	)		NMF
Total revenues		30,462			25,156			21.1	%		63,510			47,356			34.1	%

EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits		12,482			10,649			17.2	%		26,457			19,708			34.2	%
Non-cash stock grant compensation		89			59			50.8	%		180			117			53.8	%
Other operating expenses		5,179			4,174			24.1	%		10,491			7,400			41.8	%
Amortization		1,965			1,515			29.7	%		3,996			2,732			46.3	%
Depreciation		497			386			28.8	%		968			748			29.4	%
Interest		2,510			2,209			13.6	%		5,183			3,968			30.6	%
Total expenses		22,722			18,992			19.6	%		47,275			34,673			36.3	%

Income before income taxes	$	7,740		$	6,164			25.6	%	$	16,235		$	12,683			28.0	%

Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees		5.4	%		2.6	%					6.2	%		1.9	%

Employee compensation and benefits ratio		41.0	%		42.3	%					41.7	%		41.6	%

Other operating expenses ratio		17.0	%		16.6	%					16.5	%		15.6	%

Capital expenditures	$	1,368		$	587					$	2,131		$	671

Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004										$	407,058		$	324,545

Total revenues for National Programs for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 21.1%, or $5.3 million, to $30.5 million. Contingent commissions for the second quarter of 2005 increased $0.1 million over the second quarter of 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $3.8 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth, and therefore, the National Programs Division’s internal growth rate for the core commissions and fees was 5.4%. Although the Professional Programs Division had a decrease of 5.7% in internal growth rate due to the continued softening of professional liability rates, it was offset by a strong 13.0% internal growth rate in our Special Programs Division which was attributable principally to increased premium rates in the condominium program administered by Florida Intracoastal Underwriters Limited Company (“FIU”). Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 25.6%, or $1.6 million, to $7.7 million, over the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to earnings from acquisitions completed since the third quarter of 2004 and net new business growth.

Total revenues for National Programs for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 34.1%, or $16.2 million, to $63.5 million. Contingent commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.2 million over the same period in 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $11.8 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth. Therefore the National Programs Division’s internal growth rate for core commissions and fees was 6.2%. Although the Professional Programs Division had a decrease of 3.8% in internal growth rate due to the continued softening of professional liability rates, it was offset by a strong 13.9% internal growth rate in our Special Programs Division which was attributable principally to increased premium rates in the condominium program administered by FIU and net new business in our public entity business. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 28.0%, or $3.6 million, to $16.2 million, over the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to net new business growth and earnings from acquisitions completed since the third quarter of 2004.

Brokerage

The Brokerage Division markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers. Financial information relating to our Brokerage Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			% Change			2005			2004			% Change
REVENUES
Commissions and fees	$	34,077		$	8,270			312.1	%	$	55,444		$	16,900			228.1	%
Contingent commissions		1,150			123			835.0	%		3,409			3,565			(4.4	)%
Investment income		368			-			NMF			383			-			NMF
Other income, net		6			-			NMF			14			11			27.3	%
Total revenues		35,601			8,393			324.2	%		59,250			20,476			189.4	%

EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits		16,497			4,115			300.9	%		26,959			8,820			205.7	%
Non-cash stock grant compensation		41			25			64.0	%		82			50			64.0	%
Other operating expenses		5,293			1,646			221.6	%		8,633			3,446			150.5	%
Amortization		1,551			122			NMF			2,306			242			852.9	%
Depreciation		338			128			164.1	%		540			245			120.4	%
Interest		3,566			200			NMF			5,355			430			NMF
Total expenses		27,286			6,236			337.6	%		43,875			13,233			231.6	%

Income before income taxes	$	8,315		$	2,157			285.5	%	$	15,375		$	7,243			112.3	%

Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees		19.7	%		16.1	%					17.5	%		14.4	%

Employee compensation and benefits ratio		46.3	%		49.0	%					45.5	%		43.1	%

Other operating expenses ratio		14.9	%		19.6	%					14.6	%		16.8	%

Capital expenditures	$	616		$	73					$	836		$	223

Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004										$	452,372		$	82,573

The Brokerage Division’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 324.2%, or $27.2 million, to $35.6 million over the same period in 2004. Contingent commissions for the second quarter of 2005 increased $1.0 million over the same quarter of 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $24.1 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. The substantial increase in revenues from acquisitions was generated primarily from Hull & Company, Inc., which was acquired on March 1, 2005 and has estimated annualized revenues of $63.0 million. Other acquisitions made in the Brokerage Division during the last year include Braishfield Associates, Inc. and ECC Insurance Brokers, LLC, both acquired on January 1, 2005 and International E&S acquired in September 2004. Also as a result of these acquisitions, amortization expense and interest expense increased significantly. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth in core commissions and fees. Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 285.5%, or $6.2 million, to $8.3 million over the same period in 2004, primarily due to earnings from acquisitions and net new business.

The Brokerage Division’s total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 189.4%, or $38.8 million, to $59.3 million over the same period in 2004. Contingent commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased $0.2 million from the same period in 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $35.5 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004, as previously mentioned. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth in core commissions and fees. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 112.3%, or $8.1 million, to $15.4 million over the same period in 2004, primarily due to earnings from acquisitions and net new business.

Services

The Services Division provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers’ compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets and managed healthcare services. Financial information relating to our Services Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			% Change			2005			2004			% Change
REVENUES
Commissions and fees	$	6,449		$	6,831			(5.6	)%	$	12,833		$	13,295			(3.5	)%
Contingent commissions		-			-			-			-			-			-
Investment income		-			-			-			-			-			-
Other income, net		1,005			1,002			0.3	%		1,005			1,002			0.3	%
Total revenues	$	7,454		$	7,833			(4.8	)%	$	13,838		$	14,297			(3.2	)%

EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits		3,766			3,915			(3.8	)%		7,571			7,752			(2.3	)%
Non-cash stock grant compensation		29			27			7.4	%		60			55			9.1	%
Other operating expenses		1,087			1,554			(30.1	)%		2,112			2,795			(24.4	)%
Amortization		11			10			10.0	%		22			19			15.8	%
Depreciation		114			91			25.3	%		220			170			29.4	%
Interest		1			33			(97.0	)%		2			67			(97.0	)%
Total expenses		5,008			5,630			(11.0	)%		9,987			10,858			(8.0	)%

Income before income taxes	$	2,446		$	2,203			11.0	%	$	3,851		$	3,439			12.0	%

Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees		6.0	%		22.9	%					8.5	%		17.8	%

Employee compensation and benefits ratio		50.5	%		50.0	%					54.7	%		54.2	%

Other operating expenses ratio		14.6	%		19.8	%					15.3	%		19.5	%

Capital expenditures	$	118		$	280					$	202		$	396

Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004										$	15,061		$	14,940

The Services Division’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 decreased 4.8%, or $0.4 million, to $7.5 million from the same period in 2004. On June 30, 2004, we sold our medical services operation in Louisiana. This medical services operation had estimated quarterly revenues of approximately $0.7 million and the sale of this operation resulted in lower quarterly revenues for this Division. Core commissions and fees, which excludes the prior period revenues from this divestiture, reflect an internal growth rate of 6.0% for the second quarter of 2005. Other income primarily represents the gain on the sale of the medical services operation in Louisiana, recognized partly in 2004 based on the minimum purchase price, and the subsequent earn-out gain recognized in June 2005. Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 11.0%, or $0.2 million, to $2.4 million from the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of the gain on this divestiture.

The Services Division’s total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased 3.2%, or $0.5 million, to $13.8 million from the same period in 2004. Core commissions and fees, excluding the prior period revenues from the divestiture referred to above, reflect an internal growth rate of 8.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 12.0%, or $0.4 million, to $3.8 million from the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of the gain on this divestiture.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2005 totaled $42.9 million, a decrease of $145.2 million from the $188.1 million balance at December 31, 2004. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, $94.3 million of cash was provided from operating activities. During this period, $215.2 million was used to acquire other agencies and books of business (“customer accounts”), $7.2 million was used for additions to fixed assets, $8.8 million was used for payments on long-term debt, and $11.1 million was used for the payment of dividends.

As of June 30, 2005, our contractual cash obligations were as follows (in thousands):

				Payments Due by Period
Contractual Cash Obligations		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
Long term debt	$	269,925	$	49,692	$	19,800	$	294	$	200,139
Capital lease obligations		20		7		13		-		-
Other long term liabilities		9,078		6,368		945		642		1,123
Operating leases		78,780		17,881		28,240		19,277		13,382
Maximum future acquisition contingent payments		197,611		113,103		84,492		16		-
Total contractual cash obligations	$	555,414	$	187,051	$	133,490	$	20,229	$	214,644

In July 2004, we completed a private placement of $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (the "Notes"). The $200.0 million is divided into two series: Series A, for $100.0 million, due in 2011 and bearing interest at 5.57% per year; and Series B, for $100.0 million, due in 2014 and bearing interest at 6.08% per year. The closing on the Series B Notes occurred on July 15, 2004. The closing on the Series A Notes occurred on September 15, 2004. The Company has used, and anticipates continuing to use, the proceeds from the Notes for general corporate purposes, including repayment of existing debt and acquisitions. As of June 30, 2005 there was an outstanding balance of $200.0 million on the Notes.

In September 2003, we established an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a national banking institution that provided for available borrowings of up to $75.0 million, with a maturity date of October 2008, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.625% to 1.625%, depending upon our quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation. A commitment fee of 0.175% to 0.375% per annum is assessed on the unused balance. As of June 30, 2005, there were no borrowings against this Revolving Credit Facility.

In January 2001, we entered into a $90.0 million unsecured seven-year term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with a national banking institution, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.00%, depending upon our quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation. The 90-day LIBOR was 3.49% as of June 30, 2005. The Term Loan was fully funded on January 3, 2001 and as of June 30, 2005 had an outstanding balance of $32.1 million. This Term Loan is to be repaid in equal quarterly installments of $3.2 million through December 2007.

To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the then remaining six years of the Term Loan, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest payments at an annual rate of 4.53%. This agreement did not impact or change the required 0.50% to 1.00% credit risk spread portion of the Term Loan. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended, we recorded a liability as of June 30, 2005 for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $169,000, net of income taxes of approximately $108,000. We have designated and assessed the derivative as a highly effective cash flow hedge.

We (including our subsidiaries) have never incurred off-balance sheet obligations through the use of, or investment in, off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments or structured finance or special purpose entities organized as corporations, partnerships or limited liability companies, or trusts.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments portfolio, funds generated from operations, and available credit facility borrowings are sufficient to satisfy our normal short-term financial needs.

Recent Industry Development

See Item 1 of Part II for a discussion of the current legal proceedings concerning the insurance industry’s compensation practices.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

We make “forward-looking statements” within the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this report and in the documents we incorporate by reference into this report. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,”“will,”“expect,”“anticipate,”“believe,”“estimate,”“plan” and “continue” or similar words. We have based these statements on our current expectations about future events. Although we believe that our expectations reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, our actual results may differ materially from what we currently expect. Important factors which could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this report include:

·	material adverse changes in economic conditions in the markets we serve;

·	future regulatory actions and conditions in the states in which we conduct our business;

·	competition from others in the insurance agency and brokerage business;

a significant portion of business written by Brown & Brown is for customers located in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Washington. Accordingly, the occurrence of adverse economic conditions, an adverse regulatory climate, or a disaster in any of these states could have a material adverse effect on our business, although no such conditions have been encountered in the past;

·	the integration of our operations with those of businesses or assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future and the failure to realize the expected benefits of such integration; and

·	other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.

You should carefully read this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and equity prices. We are exposed to market risk through our investments, revolving credit line and term loan agreements.

Our invested assets are held as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, available-for-sale marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit. These investments are subject to interest rate risk and equity price risk. The fair values of our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, and certificates of deposit at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 approximated their respective carrying values due to their short-term duration and therefore such market risk is not considered to be material.

We do not actively invest or trade in equity securities. In addition, we generally dispose of any significant equity securities received in conjunction with an acquisition shortly after the acquisition date. However, we have no current intention to add to or dispose of any of the 559,970 common stock shares of Rock-Tenn Company, a publicly-held New York Stock Exchange-listed company, which we have owned for over 10 years. The investment in Rock-Tenn Company accounted for 64% and 68% of the total value of available-for-sale marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Rock-Tenn Company’s closing stock price at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $12.65 and $15.16, respectively. Our exposure to equity price risk is primarily related to the Rock-Tenn Company investment. As of June 30, 2005, the value of the Rock-Tenn Company investment was $7,084,000.

To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the then remaining six years of our seven-year $90.0 million term loan, on December 5, 2001 we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating rate LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest rate payments at 4.53%. We do not otherwise enter into derivatives, swaps or other similar financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

At June 30, 2005, the interest rate swap agreement was as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	Contractual/ Notional Amount		Fair Value			Weighted Average Pay Rates			Weighted Average Received Rates

Interest rate swap agreement	$	32,143	$	(277	)		4.53	%		2.78	%

ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1939, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (“Disclosure Controls”). Although we believe that our pre-existing Disclosure Controls, including our internal controls, were adequate to enable us to comply with our disclosure obligations, as a result of such Evaluation, we implemented certain minor changes, primarily to formalize, document and update the procedures already in place. Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, subject to the limitations noted herein, our Disclosure Controls are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports.

Changes in Internal Controls

There has not been any change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the Evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

CEO and CFO Certifications

Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certifications”). This Item 4 of this report, which you are currently reading, is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications, and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Policyholder Actions and Related Matters

As previously disclosed, a demand letter from counsel purporting to represent a current shareholder of the Company and seeking the commencement of a derivative suit by the Company against the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers and directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to Brown & Brown’s participation in contingent commission agreements (the “Demand Letter”) was received by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2004. The Special Review Committee (the “Committee”), comprised of independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors, was subsequently established to investigate and reach a determination concerning the merits of the proposed derivative action. The Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in this endeavor. In July 2005, the Committee communicated to the Company and to the attorney who sent the Demand Letter its determination that maintenance of the derivative suit is not in the best interests of the Company. To date, no further communication has been received from the attorney who sent the Demand Letter.

As previously disclosed, Brown & Brown has contingent commission agreements with certain underwriters, including revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance underwriters based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with that underwriter, and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and overall volume of business placed with the underwriter. To a lesser extent, Brown & Brown has some override commission agreements which allow for commissions to be paid by insurance underwriters in excess of the standard commission rate in specific lines of business, such as group health business. Brown & Brown has not chosen to discontinue receiving contingent commissions.

Other

Brown & Brown is involved in numerous pending or threatened proceedings by or against Brown & Brown that arise incident to the nature of its business. The damages that may be claimed in these various proceedings are substantial, including in many instances claims for punitive or extraordinary damages. Some of these claims and lawsuits have been resolved, and others are in the process of being resolved, and others are still in the investigation or discovery phase. Brown & Brown will continue to respond appropriately to these claims and lawsuits, and to vigorously protect its interests.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 21, 2005. At the meeting, two matters were submitted to a vote of security holders.

1.	Election of ten directors

The number of votes cast for, withheld or abstaining with respect to the election of each of the directors is set forth below:

	For	Abstain/ Withheld
J. Hyatt Brown	61,018,036	1,965,808
Samuel P. Bell, III	55,027,026	7,956,818
Hugh M. Brown	62,478,920	504,924
Bradley Currey, Jr.	62,136,177	847,667
Jim W. Henderson	61,987,808	996,036
Theodore J. Hoepner, Jr.	61,995,384	988,460
David H. Hughes	61,759,181	1,224,663
John R. Riedman	61,905,183	1,078,661
Jan E. Smith	61,281,154	1,702,690
Chilton D. Varner	62,804,276	179,568

The proposal to amend the Company’s Stock Performance Plan (the”Plan”) to extend the term of the Plan for 10 years and also modify the Plan to provide that awards granted under the Performance Plan generally will not be subject to the tax deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The number of votes cast for, against or abstaining with respect to the proposal to the Company’s Stock Performance Plan is set forth below:

For	50,137,494
Against	774,559
Abstain	1,237,714

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 3.1	Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (adopted April 24, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003), and Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).

Exhibit 3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3b to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002).

Exhibit 4.1	Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2004, among the Company and the listed Purchasers of the 5.57% Series A Senior Notes due September 15, 2011 and 6.08% Series B Senior Notes due July 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).

Exhibit 4.2	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving and Term Loan Agreement dated and effective July 15, 2004, by and between Brown & Brown, Inc. and SunTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).

Exhibit 4.3	Second Amendment to Revolving Loan Agreement dated and effective July 15, 2004, by and between Brown & Brown, Inc. and SunTrust Bank. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).

Exhibit 4.4	Rights Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1999, between the Company and First Union National Bank, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 2, 1999).

Exhibit 31.1	Section 302 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Exhibit 31.2	Section 302 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

Exhibit 32.1	Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Exhibit 32.2	Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

(b)

REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K on April 19, 2005. This current report reported Item 12, which announced that the Company issued a press release on April 19, 2005, relating to the Company’s earnings for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.

The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K on May 3, 2005. This current report reported Item 2.02, which announced that the Company’s shareholders amended the Company’s Stock Performance Plan at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 21, 2005.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	BROWN & BROWN, INC.

Date: August 9, 2005	By:	/S/ CORY T. WALKER
		Cory T. Walker
		Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (duly authorized officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

Unassociated Document

Exhibit 31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, J. Hyatt Brown, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brown & Brown, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 9, 2005
/S/ J. HYATT BROWN
J. Hyatt Brown
Chief Executive Officer

Unassociated Document

Exhibit 31.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cory T. Walker, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brown & Brown, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 9, 2005

/S/ CORY T. WALKER
Cory T. Walker
Chief Financial Officer

Unassociated Document

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, J. Hyatt Brown, the chief executive officer of Brown & Brown, Inc., hereby certify, in my capacity as an officer of Brown & Brown, Inc. and to my actual knowledge, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Brown & Brown, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Date: August 9, 2005

/S/ J. HYATT BROWN

J. Hyatt Brown

Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brown & Brown, Inc. and will be retained by Brown & Brown, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Unassociated Document

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cory T. Walker, the chief financial officer of Brown & Brown, Inc., hereby certify, in my capacity as an officer of Brown & Brown, Inc. and to my actual knowledge, that:

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Date: August 9, 2005

/S/ CORY T. WALKER

Cory T. Walker

Chief Financial Officer